Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382862›Full record

ReviewExperimental brain research2020

Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?

Jens Bo Nielsen, Mark Schram Christensen, Simon Francis Farmer, Jakob Lorentzen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06837025 (The Efficacy of Fascial Manipulation Compared to Stretching in the Rehabilitation of Children With Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06837025 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Fascial Manipulation Compared to Stretching in the Rehabilitation of Children With Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrton Orthopaedic HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsCerebral Palsy (CP)ArmsFascial manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Relationship Between Spinal Reflexes and Spastic Movement Disorders.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Complications of Spastic Cerebral Palsy.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of Neural and Non-Neural Origins of Joint Hyper-Resistance Based on a Novel Neuromechanical Model.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens Bo NielsenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jbnielsen@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-2916
Mark Schram ChristensenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simon Francis FarmerDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Jakob LorentzenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spastic movement disorder is characterized by reduced ability to selectively activate muscles with significant co-activation of antagonist muscles. It has traditionally been thought that hyperexcitable stretch reflexes have a central role in the pathophysiology and the clinical manifestations of the disorder. Here we argue that the main functional challenges for persons with spastic movement disorder are related to contractures, paresis, weak muscles and inappropriate central motor commands, whereas hyperexcitable reflexes play no or only an insignificant functional role. Co-activation of antagonist muscles and stiff posture and gait may rather be adaptations that aim to ensure joint and postural stability due to insufficient muscle strength. Aberrant (involuntary) muscle activity is likely related to an inadequate prediction of the sensory consequences of movement and a resulting impairment of muscle coordination. We argue that improvement of functional muscle strength and muscle coordination following central motor lesions may be achieved by optimizing integration of somatosensory information into central feedforward motor programs, whereas anti-spastic therapy that aims to reduce reflex activity may be less efficient. This opens for novel investigations into new treatment strategies that may improve functional control of movement and prevent reduced joint mobility in people with brain lesions.

Indexed as

Movement DisordersMuscle SpasticityElectromyographyHumansMovementMuscle, SkeletalReflexReflex, StretchNeurological disordersSpastic paresis

Identifiers

PMID32382862
OpenAlexW3022416606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.