Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382826›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2020

Comparison of the rate of dedifferentiation with increasing passages among cell sources for an in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier.

Takashi Fujimoto, Yoichi Morofuji, Shinsuke Nakagawa, Andrej Kovac, Nobutaka Horie, Tsuyoshi Izumo, Masami Niwa, Takayuki Matsuo, William A Banks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of fasudil on blood-brain barrier integrity.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Takashi FujimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Yoichi MorofujiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. yoichi51@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7135-2220
Shinsuke NakagawaDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
Andrej KovacInstitute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 84510, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Nobutaka HorieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Tsuyoshi IzumoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Masami NiwaBBB Laboratory, PharmaCo-Cell Company, Ltd., Dai-ichi-senshu bldg. 2nd floor, 6-19 Chitose-machi, Nagasaki, 850-8135, Japan.
Takayuki MatsuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
William A BanksVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Seattle, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Nagasaki University · JPSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell culture-based blood-brain barrier (BBB) models are useful experimental tools for developing central nervous system drugs. Several endothelial cell sources exist for BBB models, including primary cultured brain endothelial cells and immortalized cell lines. Among them, primary cell-based models are considered suitable for the functional analysis of the BBB; however, little is known about the utility of low-passage brain endothelial cells for this purpose. In this study, we investigated the effect of passage on brain endothelial cells from human, mouse and rat brain tissue as BBB models. We established in vitro BBB models using primary brain endothelial cells (Passage 1-Passage 4) from humans, mice, and rats. To analyze the effect of cell type on BBB function, we evaluated transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and performed immunofluorescence staining of tight junction proteins. Among the brain endothelial cell models, TEER was highest in the Passage 1 (P1) cell-based BBB model. There was no adequate increase in TEER in other low-passage cultures (P2-P4). A confluent, non-overlapping, uniform monolayer of cells in all P1 cell-based models was visible on immunostaining of tight junction proteins, whereas it was weak or undetectable in more passaged cultures. Increasing passages cultured of brain endothelial cells did not exhibit restrictive BBB function regardless of the cell source and despite culturing with pericytes and astrocytes. Among the tested culture models, only the lowest cultured cell-based models are suitable for functional analysis of the BBB.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierEndothelial CellsAnimalsAstrocytesCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesElectric ImpedanceMicePericytesRatsBlood–brain barrierEndothelial cellsLow-passage culturePrimary culture

Identifiers

PMID32382826
OpenAlexW3020860355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.