Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382782›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2020

Behavioural and pharmacological profiles of zebrafish administrated pyrrolidinyl benzodioxanes and prolinol aryl ethers with high affinity for heteromeric nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Daniela Braida, Luisa Ponzoni, Milena Moretti, Paola Viani, Marco Pallavicini, Cristiano Bolchi, Rebecca Appiani, Francesco Bavo, Cecilia Gotti, Mariaelvina Sala

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Teleosts as behaviour test models for social stress.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Towards Modeling Anhedonia and Its Treatment in Zebrafish.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela BraidaDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Luisa PonzoniCNR, Institute of Neuroscience, Via Vanvitelli 32, Milan, Italy.
Milena MorettiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Paola VianiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Marco PallaviciniDipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Cristiano BolchiDipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Rebecca AppianiDipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BavoDipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Cecilia GottiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. cecilia.gotti@in.cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-8643
Mariaelvina SalaDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleProlinol aryl ethers and their rigidified analogues pyrrolidinyl benzodioxanes have a high affinity for mammalian α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Electrophysiological studies have shown that the former are full agonists and the latter partial agonists or antagonists of human α4β2 receptors, but their in vivo effects are unknown. OBJECTIVES AND

methodsAs α4β2 nAChRs play an important role in the cognition and the rewarding effects of nicotine, we tested the effects of two full agonists and one antagonist on spatial learning, memory and attention in zebrafish using a T-maze task and virtual object recognition test (VORT). The effect of a partial agonist in reducing nicotine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) was also investigated.

resultsIn comparison with the vehicle alone, the full agonists MCL-11 and MCL-28 induced a significant cognitive enhancement as measured by the reduced running time in the T-maze and increased attention as measured by the increased discrimination index in the VORT. MCL-11 was 882 times more potent than nicotine. The two compounds were characterised by an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve, and their effects were blocked by the co-administration of the antagonist MCL-117, which alone had no effect. The partial agonist MCL-54 induced CPP and had an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve similar to that of nicotine but blocked the reinforcing effect of co-administered nicotine. Binding studies showed that all of the compounds have a higher affinity for heteromeric [

conclusionsThese behavioural studies indicate that full agonist prolinol aryl ethers are very active in increasing spatial learning, memory and attention in zebrafish. The benzodioxane partial agonist MCL-54 reduced nicotine-induced CPP, and the benzodioxane antagonist MCL-117 blocked all agonist-induced activities.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthersFemaleMaleMaze LearningMorphinansNicotineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AntagonistsPyrrolidinesPyrrolidinonesReceptors, NicotinicZebrafishEthersMorphinansNicotineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic Antagonistsnicotinic receptor alpha4beta2N-propargylprolinolPyrrolidinesPyrrolidinonesReceptors, NicotinicAntagonistEpibatidineFull agonistNicotinic receptorsPartial agonistT-mazeVORTZebrafishαBungarotoxin

Identifiers

PMID32382782
OpenAlexW3022873029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.