ArticleBiology methods & protocols2020
Practical genotyping by single-nucleotide primer extension.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Genetic Techniques in Biomarker Analysis Relevant for Drugs Centrally Approved in Europe.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Review
- Prostate cancer risk variants of the HOXB genetic locus.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- 8q24 genetic variation and comprehensive haplotypes altering familial risk of prostate cancer.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies bring into focus specific genetic variants of particular interest for which validation is often sought in large numbers of study subjects. Practical alternative methods are limiting for the application of genotyping few variants in many samples. A common scenario is the need to genotype a study population at a specific high-value single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) or insertion-deletion (indel). Not all such variants, however, will be amenable to assay by a given approach. We have adapted a single-nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE) method that may be tailored to genotype a required variant, and implemented it as a useful general laboratory protocol. We demonstrate reliable application for production-scale genotyping, successfully converting 87% of SNPs and indels for assay with an estimated error rate of 0.003. Our implementation of the SNuPE genotyping assay is a viable addition to existing alternative methods; it is readily customizable, scalable, and uses standard reagents and a laboratory plate reader.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.