Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382556›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2020

Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Midazolam for Premedication in Pediatric Dental Patients under General Anesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Li Wang, Lili Huang, Tiejun Zhang, Wei Peng

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical Use of Adrenergic Receptor Ligands in Acute Care Settings.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li WangThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laoratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-728X
Lili HuangThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laoratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-1375
Tiejun ZhangThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laoratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5224-5822
Wei PengThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laoratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3495-5895
Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam on preoperative sedation and postoperative agitation in pediatric dentistry. A total of 60 children (ASA grade I, aged 3-6 years) scheduled for elective pediatric dental treatment were randomly divided into the dexmedetomidine (DEX) and midazolam (MID) groups. Ramsay sedation score, parental separation anxiety scale, mask acceptance scale, pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. The Ramsay sedation scale and hemodynamic parameters of the children were observed and recorded immediately before administration and 10, 20, and 30 min after administration. A satisfactory mask acceptance scale rate was 93.33% in both MID and DEX groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralElective Surgical ProceduresAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, OralChildChild, PreschoolDexmedetomidineEmergence DeliriumFemaleHumansMaleMidazolamDexmedetomidineMidazolam

Identifiers

PMID32382556
PMCPMC7196136
OpenAlexW3019976820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.