Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382515›Full record

ReviewInternet interventions2020

The effect of e-mental health interventions on academic performance in university and college students: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

F Bolinski, N Boumparis, A Kleiboer, P Cuijpers, D D Ebert, H Riper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internet interventions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F BolinskiDepartment of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
N BoumparisDepartment of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A KleiboerDepartment of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D D EbertDepartment of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
H RiperDepartment of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health symptoms are common among college and university students and these can affect their academic performance. E-mental health interventions have proven effective in addressing mental health complaints but their effect on academic performance has not been synthesized yet.

objectivesTo synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials for the effectiveness of e-mental health interventions on academic performance in college and university students compared to inactive controls. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We searched six databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, Web of Science) during the period January 2000 until September 2019 for randomized controlled trials that reported on e-mental health interventions (guided or unguided) for college and university students and measured academic performance (e.g. grade point average). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsStudy and participant characteristics and the academic performance measures at post-intervention were extracted. The latter were pooled and Hedges'

resultsSix studies containing 2428 participants were included in the meta-analysis. These focussed on either mood and anxiety or alcohol and tobacco use. The pooling of data resulted in a small but non-significant effect of DISCUSSION: Despite the small and non-significant effect, our meta-analysis points to a promising direction for the effectiveness of e-mental health interventions on academic performance. Yet, these results must be interpreted with caution, as heterogeneity was high and few studies on the effectiveness of e-mental health interventions for students reported academic performance measures.

Indexed as

Academic performanceCollegeE-mental healthMeta-analysisStudentsUniversity

Identifiers

PMID32382515
PMCPMC7201188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.