Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382493›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

State by state implementation of Zika virus testing guidance in the United States in 2017 and 2018.

Marc Trotochaud, Tara Kirk Sell, Sanjana J Ravi, Carolina I Andrada, Jennifer B Nuzzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marc TrotochaudThe Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, 621 East Pratt Street Suite 210, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States.
Tara Kirk SellThe Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, 621 East Pratt Street Suite 210, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States.
Sanjana J RaviThe Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, 621 East Pratt Street Suite 210, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States.
Carolina I AndradaThe Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, 621 East Pratt Street Suite 210, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States.
Jennifer B NuzzoThe Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, 621 East Pratt Street Suite 210, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2015 and 2016, outbreaks of the Zika virus began occurring in the Americas and the Caribbean. Following the introduction of this new threat, the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued testing guidance for the nation's state public health laboratories. We collected and analyzed testing guidance for all fifty states and the District of Columbia for both 2017 and 2018. In both years, state testing guidance was consistent for men and non-pregnant women, but there was notable variation in guidance for pregnant women. In addition, there were changes between the two years as testing algorithms shifted toward guidance that recommended testing in more limited circumstances. States adopted large, or complete, portions of CDC testing guidance, but were not required to conform completely, 33% of states had identical guidance in 2017 and 49% in 2018. Some of these trends, such as specifying that testing be contingent on travel, or sexual contact with an individual who has recently traveled, to an area where the Zika virus was circulating, presents a potential deficiency in the United States surveillance capacity. Understanding variations in state testing guidance enables public health professionals to better understand ongoing surveillance. This analysis provides insight into the testing practices for the various states across the country. Better understanding of how states approach Zika testing, and how that testing changes over time, will increase the public health community's ability to interpret future Zika case counts.

Indexed as

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDC, Washington District of ColumbiaTesting guidanceUnited StatesUS, United StatesZika virus

Identifiers

PMID32382493
PMCPMC7199004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.