Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382431›Full record

ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2020

A tiered system using substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptomatic state scores to evaluate 2-year outcomes of hip arthroscopy with the Hip Outcome Score.

RobRoy L Martin, Benjamin R Kivlan, John J Christoforetti, Andrew B Wolff, Shane J Nho, John P Salvo, Geoff Van Thiel, Dean Matsuda, Dominic S Carreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Defining the postoperative alpha angle threshold for improved outcomes in posterolateral cam lesions.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

RobRoy L MartinDepartment of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA.
Benjamin R KivlanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA.
John J ChristoforettiTexas Health Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1120 Raintree Circle Allen, TX 75013, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6828-8571
Andrew B WolffHip Preservation and Sports Medicine, Washington Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2021 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Shane J NhoDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hip Preservation Center, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Parkway Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
John P SalvoOrthopaedic Surgery, Hip Arthroscopy Program, The Sydney Kimmel Medical College, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Geoff Van ThielRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, US National Soccer Teams, Chicago Blackhawks Medical Network, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Dean MatsudaHip Arthroscopy DISC Sports and Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 3501 Jamboree Rd #1250, Newport Beach, CA 92660, USA.
Dominic S CarreiraPeachtree Orthopedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 3200 Downwood Cir NW Office - Suite 700, Atlanta, GA 30327, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no information to define variations in hip arthroscopy outcomes at 2-year follow-up using the Hip Outcome Score (HOS). To offer a tiered system using HOS absolute substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) scores for 2-year hip arthroscopy outcome assessment. This was a retrospective review of patients having hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and/or chondrolabral pathology. On initial assessment and 2 years (±2 months) post-operatively, subjects completed the HOS activity of daily living (ADL) and Sports subscales, categorical self-rating of function and visual analog scale for satisfaction with surgery. Receiver operator characteristic analysis identified absolute SCB and PASS HOS ADL and Sports subscale scores. Subjects consisted of 462 (70%) females and 196 (30%) males with a mean age of 35.3 years [standard deviation (SD) 13] and mean follow-up of 722 days (SD 29). SCB and PASS scores for the HOS ADL and Sports subscales were accurate in identifying those at a 'nearly normal' and 'normal' self- report of function and at least 75% and 100% levels of satisfaction (area under the curve >0.70). This study provides tiered SCB and PASS HOS scores to define variations in 2-year (±2 months) outcome after hip arthroscopy. HOS ADL subscale scores of 84 and 94 and Sports subscale scores of 61 and 87 were associated with a 'nearly normal' and 'normal' self-report of function, respectively. HOS ADL subscale scores of 86 and 94 and Sports subscale score of 74 and 87 were associated with being at least 75% and 100% satisfied with surgery, respectively. Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.

Identifiers

PMID32382431
PMCPMC7195928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.