ReviewInterventional cardiology (London, England)2020
Precision Medicine in Interventional Cardiology.
Review in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles in interventional cardiology: trends, authors, journals, origins, and gender representation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Review
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Cardiology: A Systematic Review of Current Applications.Cureus · 2025Review
- Patient-specificFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Genetics.Cureus · 2024Review
- Computational Cardiology: The Door to the Future of Interventional Cardiology.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- High fidelity blood flow in a patient-specific arteriovenous fistula.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine has recently become widely advocated. It revolves around the individual patient, taking into account genetic, biomarker, phenotypic or psychosocial characteristics and uses biological, mechanical and/or personal variables to optimise individual therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.