Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382082›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2020

High-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities at low blast counts herald death by CML.

Rüdiger Hehlmann, Astghik Voskanyan, Michael Lauseker, Markus Pfirrmann, Lida Kalmanti, Sebastien Rinaldetti, Katharina Kohlbrenner, Claudia Haferlach, Brigitte Schlegelberger, Alice Fabarius and 17 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.

Rüdiger HehlmannELN Foundation, Weinheim, Germany. hehlmann.eln@gmail.com.
Astghik VoskanyanIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Michael LausekerIBE Universität München, München, Germany.
Markus PfirrmannIBE Universität München, München, Germany.
Lida KalmantiIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Sebastien RinaldettiIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Katharina KohlbrennerIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Claudia HaferlachMLL, München, Germany.
Brigitte SchlegelbergerInstitut für Humangenetik, MHH, Hannover, Germany.
Alice FabariusIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Wolfgang SeifarthIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Birgit SpießIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Patrick WuchterInstitut für Transfusionsmedizin und Immunologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DRK-Blutspendedienst, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan KrauseMedizinische Klinik 5, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-4651
Hans-Jochem KolbMedizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Großhadern, München, Germany.
Andreas NeubauerKlinik für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum, Marburg, Germany.
Dieter K Hossfeld2. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph NerlKlinikum Schwabing, München, Germany.
Alois GratwohlUniversitätsspital, Basel, Switzerland.
Gabriela M BaerlocherInselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Andreas BurchertKlinik für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum, Marburg, Germany.
Tim H BrümmendorfUniklinik RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Jörg HasfordIBE Universität München, München, Germany.
Andreas HochhausKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum, Jena, Germany.
Susanne SaußeleIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Michele BaccaraniDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
SAKK and the German CML Study Group
Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEHeidelberg University · DEPraxis für Humangenetik · DEUniversität Hamburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESt. Marien Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohanniter-Krankenhaus Bonn · DEKrankenhaus Düren · DEKrankenhaus Nordwest · DEOrthopädische Praxis · DEPraxis für Humangenetik Tübingen · DESankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler · DESiloah St. Trudpert Klinikum · DESt. Vincenz-Krankenhaus Limburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blast crisis is one of the remaining challenges in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Whether additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) enable an earlier recognition of imminent blastic proliferation and a timelier change of treatment is unknown. One thousand five hundred and ten imatinib-treated patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML randomized in CML-study IV were analyzed for ACA/Ph+ and blast increase. By impact on survival, ACAs were grouped into high risk (+8, +Ph, i(17q), +17, +19, +21, 3q26.2, 11q23, -7/7q abnormalities; complex) and low risk (all other). The presence of high- and low-risk ACAs was linked to six cohorts with different blast levels (1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) in a Cox model. One hundred and twenty-three patients displayed ACA/Ph+ (8.1%), 91 were high risk. At low blast levels (1-15%), high-risk ACA showed an increased hazard to die compared to no ACA (ratios: 3.65 in blood; 6.12 in marrow) in contrast to low-risk ACA. No effect was observed at blast levels of 20-30%. Sixty-three patients with high-risk ACA (69%) died (n = 37) or were alive after progression or progression-related transplantation (n = 26). High-risk ACA at low blast counts identify end-phase CML earlier than current diagnostic systems. Mortality was lower with earlier treatment. Cytogenetic monitoring is indicated when signs of progression surface or response to therapy is unsatisfactory.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlast CrisisCause of DeathFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedRiskYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32382082
PMCPMC7387244
OpenAlexW3023021367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.