Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382078›Full record

Trial reportProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2020

Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2-10 ng/mL.

Ronald Tutrone, Michael J Donovan, Phillipp Torkler, Vasisht Tadigotla, Tom McLain, Mikkel Noerholm, Johan Skog, James McKiernan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03235687 (A Prospective, Randomized Blinded, Shared Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03235687 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized Blinded, Shared Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore), EPI Test, in Men Presenting for Initial Biopsy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorExosome Diagnostics, Inc.Ran2017 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsCancer of the ProstateArmsExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Extracellular Vesicles and the Gartner Hype Cycle.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald TutroneChesapeake Urology Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael J DonovanDepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Phillipp TorklerExosome Diagnostics GmbH, a Bio-Techne brand, Martinsried, Germany.
Vasisht TadigotlaExosome Diagnostics Inc, a Bio-Techne brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Tom McLainExosome Diagnostics Inc, a Bio-Techne brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Mikkel NoerholmExosome Diagnostics GmbH, a Bio-Techne brand, Martinsried, Germany.
Johan SkogExosome Diagnostics Inc, a Bio-Techne brand, Waltham, MA, USA. Johan.skog@bio-techne.com.
James McKiernanDepartment of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Exosome Diagnostics (United States) · USChesapeake Urology Associates · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) (EPI) test is a non-invasive risk assessment tool for detection of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPC) that informs whether to proceed with prostate biopsy. We sought to assess the impact of EPI on the decision to biopsy in a real-world clinical setting.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, two-armed clinical utility study that enrolled 1094 patients with 72 urologists from 24 urology practices. Patients were considered for prostate biopsy at enrollment based on standard clinical criteria. All patients had an EPI test; however, patients were randomized into EPI vs. control arms where only the EPI arm received results for their biopsy decision.

resultsIn the EPI arm (N = 458), 93 patients received negative EPI scores of which 63% were recommended to defer biopsy by the urologist and 74% ultimately deferred. In contrast, 87% of patients with positive EPI scores were recommended to undergo biopsy with a 72% compliance rate to the urologist's recommendation. This led to detection of 30% more HGPC compared to the control arm, and we estimate that 49% fewer HGPC were missed due to deferrals compared to standard of care (SOC). Overall, 68% of urologists reported that the EPI test influenced their biopsy decision. The primary reason not to comply with EPI results was rising PSA.

conclusionTo our knowledge this is the first report on a PC biomarker utility study with a blinded control arm. The study demonstrates that the EPI test influences the overall decision to defer or proceed with a biopsy and improves patient stratification.

Indexed as

ExosomesAgedBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerHumansKallikreinsMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesBiomarkers, TumorKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID32382078
PMCPMC7655505
OpenAlexW3020850248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.