Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382028›Full record

ReviewNPJ systems biology and applications2020

Prostate cancer screening research can benefit from network medicine: an emerging awareness.

Valeria Panebianco, Martina Pecoraro, Giulia Fiscon, Paola Paci, Lorenzo Farina, Carlo Catalano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In silico drug repurposing in COVID-19: A network-based analysis.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. AI in Prostate Cancer Screening & Diagnosis: A Registry-Based Study of ClinicalTrials.gov Trials.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valeria PanebiancoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Rome, Italy. valeria.panebianco@uniroma1.it.
Martina PecoraroDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giulia FisconInstitute for System Analysis and Computer Science (IASI), National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Paola PaciInstitute for System Analysis and Computer Science (IASI), National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo FarinaDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carlo CatalanoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Policlinico Umberto I · ITNational Research Council · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to date, screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most appealing but also a very controversial topics in the urological community. PCa is the second most common cancer in men worldwide and it is universally acknowledged as a complex disease, with a multi-factorial etiology. The pathway of PCa diagnosis has changed dramatically in the last few years, with the multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) playing a starring role with the introduction of the "MRI Pathway". In this scenario the basic tenet of network medicine (NM) that sees the disease as perturbation of a network of interconnected molecules and pathways, seems to fit perfectly with the challenges that PCa early detection must face to advance towards a more reliable technique. Integration of tests on body fluids, tissue samples, grading/staging classification, physiological parameters, MR multiparametric imaging and molecular profiling technologies must be integrated in a broader vision of "disease" and its complexity with a focus on early signs. PCa screening research can greatly benefit from NM vision since it provides a sound interpretation of data and a common language, facilitating exchange of ideas between clinicians and data analysts for exploring new research pathways in a rational, highly reliable, and reproducible way.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm GradingPredictive Value of TestsProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID32382028
PMCPMC7206063
OpenAlexW3023314969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.