ArticleCell death & disease2020
Differential effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in 2D/3D culture according to cell differentiation, p53 status and mitochondrial respiration in liver cancer cells.
Article in Cell death & disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant or conversion therapy nullifies the prognostic impact of surgical margin width in hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Loss of LLGL1 Elevates EGFR/RAS/MAPK Signaling and Remodels EMT Markers in Huh-7 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Three Noble Metal Nanoparticles Demonstrated Distinct Biological Interactions and Cell Death Pathways in Human Hepatocarcinoma Cell Lines.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Article
- A naturally occurring polyphenolic compound for liver cancer treatment.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Enhancement of apoptosis in HCT116 and HepG2 cells byChinese herbal medicines · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Modelling hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment phenotype to evaluate drug efficacy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lenvatinib and immune-checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanistic insights, clinical efficacy, and future perspectives.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Structural modification of the propyl linker of cjoc42 in combination with sulfonate ester and triazole replacements for enhanced gankyrin binding and anti-proliferative activity.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Article
- A pilot study of nintedanib in molecularly selected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensional Hepatocyte Spheroids: Model for Assessing Chemotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Review
- Zinc-Based Nanoparticles, but Not Silicon-Based Nanoparticles, Accumulate in Mitochondria and Promote Cell Death in Liver Cancer Cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Cellular Adaptation Takes Advantage of Atavistic Regression Programs during Carcinogenesis.Cancers · 2023Review
- Metabolism as a New Avenue for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Expression and Function of BMP and Activin Membrane-Bound Inhibitor (BAMBI) in Chronic Liver Diseases and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Reflections on the Biology of Cell Culture Models: Living on the Edge of Oxidative Metabolism in Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sorafenib and Regorafenib are the recommended first- and second-line therapies in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib have shown non-inferior antitumoral activities compared with the corresponding recommended therapies. The clinical trials have established recommended doses for each treatment that lead different blood concentrations in patients for Sorafenib (10 µM), Regorafenib (1 µM), Lenvatinib (0.1 µM), and Cabozantinib (1 µM). However, very low response rates are observed in patients attributed to intrinsic resistances or upregulation of survival signaling. The aim of the study was the comparative dose-response analysis of the drugs (0-100 µM) in well-differentiated (HepG2, Hep3B, and Huh7), moderately (SNU423), and poorly (SNU449) differentiated liver cancer cells in 2D/3D cultures. Cells harbors wild-type p53 (HepG2), non-sense p53 mutation (Hep3B), inframe p53 gene deletion (SNU423), and p53 point mutation (Huh7 and SNU449). The administration of regular used in vitro dose (10 µM) in 3D and 2D cultures, as well as the dose-response analysis in 2D cultures showed Sorafenib and Regorafenib were increasingly effective in reducing cell proliferation, and inducing apoptosis in well-differentiated and expressing wild-type p53 in HCC cells. Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib were particularly effective in moderately to poorly differentiated cells with mutated or lacking p53 that have lower basal oxygen consumption rate (OCR), ATP, and maximal respiration capacity than observed in differentiated HCC cells. Sorafenib and Regorafenib downregulated, and Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib upregulated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor receptor (c-Met) in HepG2 cells. Conclusions: Sorafenib and Regorafenib were especially active in well-differentiated cells, with wild-type p53 and increased mitochondrial respiration. By contrast, Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib appeared more effective in moderately to poorly differentiated cells with mutated p53 and low mitochondrial respiration. The development of strategies that allow us to deliver increased doses in tumors might potentially enhance the effectiveness of the treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.