ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2020
[Ethical issues in the clinical records of a group of terminal patients admitted into a third level hospital. Lacks and improvements.]
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTerminal patients and their relatives must know their real situation, and be treated according to the principle of autonomy, to establish therapeutic objectives adapted each one, according to their needs and decisions. The objective of this study is to identify the sufficient existence of records in the Medical Histories of terminal patients, which indicate their situation, such as the information given to the patients, or the LET, No-RCP or Z.51.5 codes, and the statistical relation they have with the sociodemographic and clinical variables.
methodsCross-sectional study in a third-level hospital, with patients admitted between January and December 2017, who died with terminal illness criteria. Data were collected from the medical records, and, fundamentally, from the nursing clinical notes. The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS program, version 22.
resultsParticipants were 140 people, 54.3% men, of 78.51 (SD=13.5) of middle age. People up to 70 years of age received less information (Odds ratio (OR): 0.077, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.015-0.390) and lower sedation (OR: 0.366, 95% CI: 0.149-0.899). Proceeding from city reduced the probability of receiving information (OR: 0.202; IC95%: 0.058-0.705). Presenting dyspnea reduced LTE (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-093), No CPR (0.29, 95% CI: 0.12-0.68) and sedation (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12-060). Fatigue increased the probability of being Non-CPR (OR: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.166-6.627) and of receiving sedation (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.065-6.331).
conclusionsEfforts to empower the patient in the decision of their process and the management of the information of their diagnosis and prognosis are still lacking. A greater and better clinical records facilitates knowing how actions are developed, allowing to identify and implement ethical and responsible interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32382000PMC11566823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.