Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32381597›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2020

Improving the paediatric surgery patient experience: an 8-year analysis of narrative quality data.

Julie M Robillard, Stephanie C Bourne, Mallorie T Tam, Patricia M Page, Elizabeth A Lamb, Carmina Gogal, Erik D Skarsgard, Kourosh Afshar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M RobillardDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada jrobilla@mail.ubc.ca.
Stephanie C BourneDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mallorie T TamDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Patricia M PageDepartment of Procedures and Surgical Services, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Elizabeth A LambDepartment of Procedures and Surgical Services, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Carmina GogalDepartment of Procedures and Surgical Services, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Erik D SkarsgardDepartment of Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kourosh AfsharDepartment of Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BC Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNarrative data about the patient experience of surgery can help healthcare professionals and administrators better understand the needs of patients and their families as well as provide a foundation for improvement of procedures, processes and services. However, units often lack a methodological framework to analyse these data empirically and derive key areas for improvement. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) is aimed at improving the quality of surgical care by collecting patient data and reporting risk-adjusted surgical outcomes for each participant hospital in the programme. Though qualitative data about patient experience are captured as part of the NSQIP database, to date no framework or methodology has been proposed, or reported on, to analyse these data for the purposes of quality improvement. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of using content analysis to empirically derive key areas for quality improvement from a sample of 3601 narrative comments about paediatric surgery from patients and families at British Columbia Children's Hospital. STUDY

designThematic content analysis conducted on a total of 3601 patient and family narratives received between 2011 and 2018.

resultsOverall satisfaction with care was high and experiences with healthcare providers at the hospital were positive. Areas for improvement were identified in the themes of health outcomes, communication and surgery timelines. Results informed follow-up interprofessional quality improvement initiatives.

conclusionsRecording and analysing patient experience data as part of validated quality improvement programmes such as ACS NSQIP can provide valuable and actionable information to improve quality of care.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdolescentBritish ColumbiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePediatricsQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareSurgical Procedures, Operativepaediatricspatient-centred caresurgery

Identifiers

PMID32381597
PMCPMC7223344
OpenAlexW3022497553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.