SynthesisHaematologica2020
Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Haematologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frailty in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Pooled it
- The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Geriatric assessment for older adults receiving less-intensive therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: report of CALGB 361101.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- Comorbidity Burden and Prognosis in Patients Aged 80+ Years With Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2026Article
- A machine learning-derived sarcopenia index is associated with survival and nonrelapse mortality in DLBCL.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Older patients with lymphoma: navigating a landscape of clinical controversies and barriers to innovation.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Novel Geriatric Risk Score for Prognostication in Older Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Toxicity of BTK Inhibitors: A Patient-Centered Framework for Risk Stratification and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Caring for Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Best Practices for Aligning Patient Fitness and Preference with Available Therapies.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Characteristics of Inpatient Falls and Factors Associated with Fall-Related Fractures and Recurrent Falls in a Japanese University Hospital.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HCT Pre-App program: a telemedicine-based prehabilitation for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant candidates.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Frailty and Quality of Life in Older Patients Treated with Chemotherapy.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) scale does not effectively identify elderly AML patients suitable for intensive induction chemotherapy - a multicenter study from Polish Adult Leukemia Group.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- The importance of assessing the fitness of older patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Role of Frailty in Assessing Eligibility for CAR T-Cell Therapy in Haematology.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to give an update of all currently available evidence on the relevance of a geriatric assessment in the treatment of older patients with hematologic malignancies. A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to find studies in which a geriatric assessment was used to detect impaired geriatric domains or to address the association between geriatric assessment and survival or clinical outcome measures. The literature search included 4,629 reports, of which 54 publications from 44 studies were included. Seventy-three percent of the studies were published in the last 5 years. The median age of the patients was 73 years (range, 58-86) and 71% had a good World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. The median prevalence of geriatric impairments varied between 17% and 68%, even in patients with a good WHO performance status. Polypharmacy, nutritional status and instrumental activities of daily living were most frequently impaired. Whereas several geriatric impairments and frailty (based on a frailty screening tool or summarized geriatric assessment score) were predictive for a shorter overall survival, WHO performance status lost its predictive value in most studies. The association between geriatric impairments and treatment-related toxicity varied, with a trend towards a higher risk of (non-)hematologic toxicity in frail patients. During the follow-up, frailty seemed to be associated with treatment non-completion, especially when patients were malnourished. Patients with a good physical capacity had a shorter stay in hospital and a lower rate of hospitalization. Geriatric assessment, even in patients with a good performance status, can detect impaired geriatric domains and these impairments may be predictive of mortality. Moreover, geriatric impairments suggest a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity, treatment non-completion and use of healthcare services. A geriatric assessment should be considered before starting treatment in older patients with hematologic malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.