Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32381537›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Effect of adiposity on differences in carotid plaque burden in studies conducted in Norway and Russia: a cross-sectional analysis of two populations at very different risk of cardiovascular mortality.

Yume Imahori, Chris Frost, Ellisiv B Mathiesen, Andrey Ryabikov, Alexander V Kudryavtsev, Sofia Malyutina, Michael Kornev, Alun D Hughes, Laila A Hopstock, David A Leon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yume ImahoriLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK yumeim0405@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2176-7150
Chris FrostLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ellisiv B MathiesenUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Andrey RyabikovReserach Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Alexander V KudryavtsevNorthern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation.
Sofia MalyutinaReserach Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Michael KornevNorthern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation.
Alun D HughesUniversity College London, London, London, UK.
Laila A HopstockUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
David A LeonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 100217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLarge differences exist in the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) between Russia and Western European countries including Norway. Obesity prevalence may contribute to the differences. We investigated whether difference in the level of adiposity, assessed using body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio(WHR), could explain intercountry differences in the burden of carotid plaque, a measure of atherosclerosis, in the populations.

designCross-sectional analysis. Logistic and linear regression models were used.

settingWe used population-based cross-sectional Know Your Heart (KYH) study in Russia and the Tromsø 7 study (Tromsø 7) in Norway.

participants3262 and 1800 men and women aged 40-69 years in KYH and Tromsø 7, respectively. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: The presence of carotid plaques and plaque score assessed using ultrasound.

resultsThe presence of carotid plaques and plaque score were higher in KYH than Tromsø 7 regardless of age group and sex. A positive association between carotid plaque burden and adiposity was found (OR of having at least one plaque per SD in WHR 1.18 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.31) for men; 1.15 (1.06 to 1.25) for women)) adjusted for age, smoking and education in a pooled analysis of the two studies. There was little evidence of the interaction between study and adiposity. These effects did not differ between the two studies. However, neither adiposity nor CVD risk factors (smoking, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, glycosylated haemoglobin) explained the higher carotid plaque burden in KYH compared with Tromsø 7.

conclusionAdiposity, especially abdominal adiposity, is a risk factor for carotid plaque in Russia and Norway, although neither adiposity nor established CVD risk factors explained the higher plaque burden in Russia. To reduce the CVD burden in Russia, beyond prevention and treatment of adiposity, further research is required to understand why Russia has a high burden of atherosclerosis.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCarotid Artery DiseasesAdiposityAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayObesityRisk FactorsRussiacardiac epidemiologyepidemiologyvascular medicine

Identifiers

PMID32381537
PMCPMC7223302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.