Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32381050›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Differences in smokers' awareness of the health risks of smoking before and after introducing pictorial tobacco health warnings: findings from the 2012-2017 international tobacco control (ITC) Netherlands surveys.

Dirk-Jan A van Mourik, Gera E Nagelhout, Marc C Willemsen, Bas van den Putte, Hein de Vries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence of coronary risk factors in load transport drivers.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dirk-Jan A van MourikDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands. d.vanmourik@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Gera E NagelhoutDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Marc C WillemsenDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Bas van den PutteNetherlands Expertise Center for Tobacco Control (NET), Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Hein de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding UM 2014-7210ZonMw 121010008ZonMw 200130002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs of May 2016, pictorial health warnings (PHWs) showing the harms of smoking were implemented in the European Union. After one year they had to be fully implemented. We studied changes in awareness of the health risks of smoking after implementation of PHWs among smokers from the Netherlands, whether the trend before the implementation changed after the implementation, and whether there were differences between subgroups.

methodsWe used survey data from six yearly waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey from 2012 to 2017. The number of participating smokers ranged between 1236 and 1604 per wave. Data were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analyses.

resultsIndicators of awareness of the health risks of smoking that did not change between 2015 and 2017 were perceived susceptibility (β = 0.043, p = 0.059) and perceived severity (β = - 0.006, p = 0.679) regarding lung problems. Perceived susceptibility, however, was more pronounced between 2015 and 2017 than between 2012 and 2015(p value of interaction: p = 0.044). Noticing information about the dangers of smoking (β = 0.119, p < 0.001) and knowledge about the health risks of smoking (β = 0.184, p < 0.001) increased between 2015 and 2017. These increases were both more pronounced when compared to 2012-2015 (p values of interactions: p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 respectively). Compared to high educated smokers, low educated smokers (β = - 1.137, p < 0.001) and moderate educated smokers (β = - 0.894, p < 0.001) were less knowledgeable about the health risks of smoking in 2016 and 2017.

conclusionsIntroducing PHWs coincided with an increase in smokers' knowledge about the health risks of smoking. Dutch tobacco control policy and campaigns should focus on improving Dutch smokers' awareness of the health risks of smoking even more, especially among low educated smokers.

Indexed as

AdvertisingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEuropean UnionFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPublic PolicyRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSmokersAwarenessLongitudinalPictorial health warningsSmokersThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID32381050
PMCPMC7206780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.