Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32380959›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Reducing physical restraints by older adults in home care: development of an evidence-based guideline.

Kristien Scheepmans, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, Louis Paquay, Hendrik Van Gansbeke, Koen Milisen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the Safewards Programme to Reduce Restrictive Practices in Residential Aged Care: Protocol for a Pilot and Feasibility Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristien ScheepmansWit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Nursing Department, Frontispiesstraat 8, bus 1.2, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernadette Dierckx de CasterléDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d - bus 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Louis PaquayWit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Nursing Department, Frontispiesstraat 8, bus 1.2, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Hendrik Van GansbekeWit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Nursing Department, Frontispiesstraat 8, bus 1.2, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Koen MilisenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d - bus 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. koen.milisen@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9230-1246
Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

Vanbreda Risk & Benefits no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestraint use is a complex and challenging issue in home care. Due to socio-demographic trends, worldwide home healthcare providers are faced with an increasing demand for restraint use from informal caregivers, patients and healthcare providers, resulting in the use of various types of restraints in home care. Awareness and knowledge of restraint use in home care, its implications and the ethical challenges surrounding it are of crucial importance to its reduction. This research aimed to describe the development process of an evidence-based practice guideline to support caregivers to optimize home care.

methodThe practice guideline was developed according to the framework of the Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and AGREE II. The guideline was developed over several stages: (1) determination of the target population and scope, (2) literature search, (3) drafting and (4) validation. A multidisciplinary working group determined the proposed purpose, target group, and six clinical questions for the guideline. A consensus procedure and consultation by experts were used to develop the guideline.

resultsThe guideline provides an answer to six clinical questions and contains ten key recommendations based on the classification of GRADE, with the objective of increasing healthcare providers' awareness, knowledge and competence to adequately deal with situations or questions related to restraint use. The guideline also includes a flowchart for dealing with complex situations where the use of restraints is requested, already present or considered.

conclusionsThe guideline was validated by the Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Increasing competence, awareness and knowledge related to restraint use are key objectives of the guideline for reducing restraint use in home care. A multicomponent intervention to support healthcare workers in implementing the guideline in clinical practice needs to be developed.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesRestraint, PhysicalAgedBelgiumCaregiversEvidence-Based MedicineHumansEvidence basedHome careNursesNursingPhysical restraintsPractice guidelineReduction

Identifiers

PMID32380959
PMCPMC7204038
OpenAlexW3023114897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.