Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32380227›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2020

Functional network connectivity (FNC)-based generative adversarial network (GAN) and its applications in classification of mental disorders.

Jianlong Zhao, Jinjie Huang, Dongmei Zhi, Weizheng Yan, Xiaohong Ma, Xiao Yang, Xianbin Li, Qing Ke, Tianzi Jiang, Vince D Calhoun and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Reinforcement learning deficits exhibited by postnatal PCP-treated rats enable deep neural network classification.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jianlong ZhaoDepartment of Automation, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, China; Brainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Jinjie HuangDepartment of Automation, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, China. Electronic address: jjhuang@hrbust.edu.cn.
Dongmei ZhiBrainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Weizheng YanBrainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Xiaohong MaPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan, 610041, China; Huaxi Brain Research Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 610041, China.
Xiao YangPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan, 610041, China; Huaxi Brain Research Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 610041, China.
Xianbin LiBeijing Key Lab of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qing KeDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Tianzi JiangBrainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Vince D CalhounTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) Center, Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Jing SuiBrainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China. Electronic address: kittysj@gmail.com.

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Informed Data-Driven Fusion of Behavior, Brain Function, and GenesR01EB005846 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2005 to 2016
$5.5M
Data-driven approaches to identify biomarkers from multimodal imaging big dataR01MH117107 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005846NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a popular deep learning method, generative adversarial networks (GAN) have achieved outstanding performance in multiple classifications and segmentation tasks. However, the application of GANs to fMRI data is relatively rare. In this work, we proposed a functional network connectivity (FNC) based GAN for classifying psychotic disorders from healthy controls (HCs), in which FNC matrices were calculated by correlation of time courses derived from non-artefactual fMRI independent components (ICs). The proposed GAN model consisted of one discriminator (real FNCs) and one generator (fake FNCs), each has four fully-connected layers. The generator was trained to match the discriminator in the intermediate layers while simultaneously a new objective loss was determined for the generator to improve the whole classification performance. In a case for classifying 269 major depressive disorder (MDD) patients from 286 HCs, an average accuracy of 70.1% was achieved in 10-fold cross-validation, with at least 6% higher compared to the other 6 popular classification approaches (54.5-64.2%). In another application to discriminating 558 schizophrenia patients from 542 HCs from 7 sites, the proposed GAN model achieved 80.7% accuracy in leave-one-site-out prediction, outperforming support vector machine (SVM) and deep neural net (DNN) by 3%-6%. More importantly, we are able to identify the most contributing FNC nodes and edges with the strategy of leave-one-FNC-out recursively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to apply the GAN model on the FNC-based classification of mental disorders. Such a framework promises wide utility and great potential in neuroimaging biomarker identification.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderSchizophreniaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerClassificationDeep learningGenerative adversarial networks (GAN)Major depressive disordersResting-state fMRISchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID32380227
PMCPMC7367699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.