Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32380191›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicology2020

Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory as a method to predict cumulative neurotoxicity.

Fjodor Melnikov, Brian C Geohagen, Terrence Gavin, Richard M LoPachin, Paul T Anastas, Phillip Coish, David W Herr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fjodor MelnikovSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, United States. Electronic address: fjodor.melnikov@yale.edu.
Brian C GeohagenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E. 210th St, Bronx, NY, 10467, United States. Electronic address: briangeohagen@yahoo.com.
Terrence GavinDepartment of Chemistry, Iona College, 402 North Avenue, New Rochelle, NY, 10804, United States. Electronic address: TGavin@iona.edu.
Richard M LoPachinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E. 210th St, Bronx, NY, 10467, United States. Electronic address: lopachin@einstein.yu.edu.
Paul T AnastasSchool of Forestry and Environmental Science, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: Paul.Anastas@yale.edu.
Phillip CoishSchool of Forestry and Environmental Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: Philip.coish@yale.edu.
David W HerrCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, United States. Electronic address: Herr.david@epa.gov.
Yale University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USIona College · US

Funding

The Nerve Terminal as the Site of Action for Type-2 AlkenesR01ES003830 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI LOPACHIN, RICHARD MICHAEL · 1986 to 2015
$4.6M
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF HEXACARBON-INDUCED AXON ATROPHYR01ES007912 · NIEHS · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI LOPACHIN, RICHARD MICHAEL · 1997 to 2009
$2.4M
Intramural EPA EPA999999NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES003830NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES007912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenobiotic electrophiles can form covalent adducts that may impair protein function, damage DNA, and may lead a range of adverse effects. Cumulative neurotoxicity is one adverse effect that has been linked to covalent protein binding as a Molecular Initiating Event (MIE). This paper describes a mechanistic in silico chemical screening approach for neurotoxicity based on Hard and Soft Acids and Bases (HSAB) theory. We evaluated the applicability of HSAB-based electrophilicity screening protocol for neurotoxicity on 19 positive and 19 negative reference chemicals. These reference chemicals were identified from the literature, using available information on mechanisms of neurotoxicity whenever possible. In silico screening was based on structural alerts for protein binding motifs and electrophilicity index in the range of known neurotoxicants. The approach demonstrated both a high positive prediction rate (82-90 %) and specificity (90 %). The overall sensitivity was relatively lower (47 %). However, when predicting the toxicity of chemicals known or suspected of acting via non-specific adduct formation mechanism, the HSAB approach identified 7/8 (sensitivity 88 %) of positive control chemicals correctly. Consequently, the HSAB-based screening is a promising approach of identifying possible neurotoxins with adduct formation molecular initiating events. While the approach must be expanded over time to capture a wider range of MIEs involved in neurotoxicity, the mechanistic nature of the screen allows users to flag chemicals for possible adduct formation MIEs. Thus, the HSAB based toxicity screening is a promising strategy for toxicity assessment and chemical prioritization in neurotoxicology and other health endpoints that involve adduct formation.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAcidsAlkaliesAnimalsEnvironmental PollutantsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNeurotoxicity SyndromesNeurotoxinsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAcidsAlkaliesEnvironmental PollutantsNeurotoxinsHard and soft acid BaseIn silicoNeurotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32380191
PMCPMC7369154
OpenAlexW3022613250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.