Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32379994›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

ABO Blood Groups and Thrombophilia Markers in Patients With Unstimulated Thrombosis in Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Ali Ibrahim Mohammed, Aveen M Raouf Abdulqader, Sana Dlawar Jalal, Sarwar Noori Mahmood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Impact of Inherited Thrombophilia in Patients With Thrombosis: Evaluating the Real Risk of FVL, PTG20210A, and MTHFR Mutations in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali Ibrahim MohammedDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Sulaymaniyah, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Aveen M Raouf AbdulqaderDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Sulaymaniyah, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4301-6470
Sana Dlawar JalalDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Sulaymaniyah, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Sarwar Noori MahmoodDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
University of Sulaimani · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thromboembolism (TE) is a complex disease caused by various acquired and inherited factors. The common mutations; factor V Leiden G1691A (FVL G1691A), prothrombin G20210A (PTG20210A), and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHFR C677T) are important inherited causes in both venous and arterial thrombosis. The association between ABO blood groups and thrombophilia has been noted by researchers. We aimed to determine the frequency and association of ABO blood groups as a risk factor along with 3 thrombophilia mutations and another 3 thrombophilia markers in a group of patients with unstimulated thrombosis. In a prospective case-control study, we focused on 100 samples, 50 patients with documented thrombosis as well as 50 healthy age-matched controls. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction and reverse hybridization to oligonucleotide particular probes were employed to detect FVL G1691A, PT G20210A, and MTHFR C677T mutations. Analysis of other thrombophilia markers including protein C (PC), protein S (PS), and antithrombin (AT) assays was also performed. ABO blood group typing was done according to standard methods. Non-O blood group was significantly more frequent among cases than controls (76% vs 54%) with high odds of TE (odds ratio [OR] = 2.69). Positivity for at least 1 thrombophilia marker was more in cases (60%) than controls (34%; OR = 2.9). The combined effect of non-O blood group and thrombophilia markers raised the risk of TE (OR = 4.16,

Indexed as

AdultBlood Group AntigensCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIraqMiddle AgedProspective StudiesThrombophiliaThrombosisBlood Group AntigensABO blood groupfactor V Leideninherited thrombophiliaMTHFRC677Tprothrombin G20210Athrombophilia mutations

Identifiers

PMID32379994
PMCPMC7370555
OpenAlexW3023714128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.