ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020
Using the PACT Resources Framework to Understand the Needs of Geriatric Primary Care Teams.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in healthcare institution choice among elderly cancer patients: evidence from a cross-sectional study in Shandong Province, China.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Exploring patient-centered care delivery in outpatient settings for older adults: a scoping review and recommendations for implementation in countries with low and middle income.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Factors affecting primary care implementation for older veterans with multimorbidity in Veterans Health Administration (VA).Health services research · 2021Article
- Rapid Integration of Home Telehealth Visits Amidst COVID-19: What Do Older Adults Need to Succeed?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo identify the perceived organizational resources required by healthcare workers to deliver geriatric primary care in a geriatric patient aligned care team (GeriPACT).
designCross-sectional observational study using deductive analyses of qualitative interviews conducted with GeriPACT team members.
settingGeriPACTs practicing at eight geographically dispersed Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare systems.
participantsGeriPACT clinicians, nurses, clerical associates, clinical pharmacists, and social workers (n = 67). MEASUREMENTS: Semistructured qualitative interviews conducted in person, transcribed, and then analyzed using the PACT Resources Framework.
resultsUsing the PACT Resources Framework, we identified facility-, clinic-, and team-level resources critical for GeriPACT implementation. Resources within each level reflect how the needs of older adults with complex comorbidity intersect with general population primary care medical home practice. GeriPACT implementation is facilitated by attention to patient characteristics such as cognitive impairment, ambulatory limitations, or social support services in staffing and resourcing teams.
conclusionModels of geriatric primary care such as GeriPACT must be implemented with an eye toward the most effective use of our most limited resource-trained geriatricians. In contrast to much of the literature on medical home teams serving a general adult population, interviews with GeriPACT members emphasize how patient needs inform all aspects of practice design including universal accessibility, near real-time response to patient needs, and ongoing interdisciplinary care coordination. Examination of GeriPACT implementation resources through the lens of traditional primary care teams illustrates the importance of tailoring primary care design to the needs of older adults with complex comorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.