Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32379842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

High performance of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for American tegumentary leishmaniasis diagnosis with Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis amastigotes membrane crude antigens.

María E Bracamonte, Agustín Moya Álvarez, Andrea M Sosa, Carlos L Hoyos, Juan J Lauthier, Silvana P Cajal, Marisa Juarez, Renato E Uncos, Fernando J Sánchez-Valdéz, Leonardo Acuña and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic Tools for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Caused byDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

María E BracamonteFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Agustín Moya ÁlvarezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-9125-8124
Andrea M SosaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Carlos L HoyosFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Juan J LauthierDepartment of Parasitology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.
Silvana P CajalInstituto de Investigaciones en Enfermedades Tropicales (IIET), Sede Regional Orán, San Ramón de la Nueva Orán, Salta, Argentina.
Marisa JuarezInstituto de Investigaciones en Enfermedades Tropicales (IIET), Sede Regional Orán, San Ramón de la Nueva Orán, Salta, Argentina.
Renato E UncosFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Fernando J Sánchez-ValdézFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Leonardo AcuñaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Patricio DiosqueFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Miguel A BasombríoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Julio R NasserLaboratorio de Química Biológica y Biología Molecular (LQByBM), Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
Yoshihisa HashiguchiDepartment of Parasitology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.
Masataka KorenagaDepartment of Parasitology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.
Paola A BarrosoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.
Jorge D MarcoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Patología Experimental, Universidad Nacional de Salta / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Salta, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-4408-0941
National University of Salta · ARKōchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) still requires the design of more effective tools. Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis is the causal agent of the 90% of Argentinean ATL cases. Considering the current knowledge, an ELISA based crude antigen (CA) for the diagnosis was designed. Ninety-nine subjects diagnosed as ATL, 27 as no-ATL, and 84 donors from non-ATL-endemic areas were included in this study. The current ATL diagnosis was based four techniques, dermal smear microscopic examination (parasitological test), PCR, Leishmanin skin test, and clinical records. We obtained CA extracts from promastigotes and amastigotes from macrophage cultures of different zymodemes of endemic Leishmania species circulating in the study area. Crude antigens from the 'local' main zymodeme of L. (V.) braziliensis showed the highest reactivity against anti-Leishmania antibodies compared to the other included species. The CA of amastigotes of this zymodeme was 3.4 fold more reactive than promastigotes one. Moreover, amastigote-membrane CA (MCA) were 3.6 fold more reactive than the soluble antigens. The MCA-ELISA reached a sensitivity and specificity of 98% (CI = 94.7%-100%) and 63.6% (53.9-73.1), respectively. When anti-Trypanosoma cruzi reactive sera were excluded, the specificity reached 98.4% (94.4-100), while the sensitivity was similar, with a positive predictive value (PV) of 98.6% (94.6-100) and negative PV of 96.3% (91.6-100). The performance of the MCA-ELISA results strongly contribute to the final diagnostic decision, since a non-reactive serological result almost discards the suspected ATL, because of its high negative PV. The developed MCA-ELISA showed a high diagnostic performance, which makes it a good candidate for ATL diagnosis, for seroprevalence studies, or for monitoring treatments efficacy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanAntibody AffinityAntibody SpecificityAntigens, ProtozoanArgentinaBlood DonorsCell MembraneEndemic DiseasesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLeishmania braziliensisLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis, MucocutaneousPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificitySeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID32379842
PMCPMC7205302
OpenAlexW3023973493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.