Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32379563›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2020

How, When, and With Whom Should Cost of Care Conversations Occur? Preferences of Two Distinct Cancer Survivor Groups.

Maria Pisu, Matthew P Banegas, Margaret I Liang, Leah Tuzzio, Nora B Henrikson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Communication of costs and financial burdens between cancer patients and healthcare providers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Unequal paths to care: a scoping review of access and cancer outcomes in Alabama.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Understanding cancer survivor cost communication experiences and preferences.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Short-term and long-term financial toxicity from breast cancer treatment: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Financial navigation: Staff perspectives on patients' financial burden of cancer care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria PisuDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Matthew P BanegasKaiser Permanente, Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
Margaret I LiangO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Leah TuzzioKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
Nora B HenriksonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
OB/GYN FACULTY RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMK12HD001258 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JENKINS, TODD R · 1999 to 2019
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCost of care (CoC) conversations should occur routinely in oncology practice. However, patient preferences about with whom, when, and how to have these conversations are missing and preferences may vary across patient populations.

methodsWe performed a secondary qualitative analysis of quotes from interviews with 28 cancer survivors from two health care settings (Kaiser Permanente Washington and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Alabama at Birmingham [UABCCC]). A targeted approach searched for three constructs: (1) Who should have CoC conversations with patients? (2) When should CoC conversations occur? and (3) How should CoC conversations happen?

resultsInterviewees were similar in age and education, but UABCCC participants had more racial/ethnic minority representation and financial distress. Within each construct, themes were similar across both groups. As to who should have CoC conversations, we found that (1) providers' main role is medical care, not CoC; and (2) care team staff members are a more appropriate choice to address CoC needs. About the question of when, we found that (3) individuals have strong convictions about when and if they want to discuss CoC; and (4) CoC information and resources need to be available when patients are ready. About the question of how, themes were (5) provide estimates of anticipated out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage; (6) provide reassurance, sympathy, and concrete solutions; and (7) because of their sensitivity, conduct CoC conversations in a comfortable, private space.

conclusionThese findings offer general guidance as to who should conduct CoC conversations and when and how they should occur, with applicability across different patient populations.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsCommunicationEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsWashington

Identifiers

PMID32379563
PMCPMC7489481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.