Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32379535›Full record

Trial reportUnited European gastroenterology journal2020

Proximal retroflexion versus second forward view of the right colon during screening colonoscopy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Ma Henar Núñez Rodríguez, Pilar Díez Redondo, Fausto Riu Pons, Marta Cimavilla, Luis Hernández, Andrea Loza, Manuel Pérez-Miranda

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in United European gastroenterology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06186778 (The Impact of Repeated Colonoscopic Insert Method on the Detection Rate of Adenomas in the Sigmoid Colon), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06186778 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Repeated Colonoscopic Insert Method on the Detection Rate of Adenomas in the Sigmoid Colon

TypeinterventionalSponsorJianning YaoRan2024 to 2024Enrolled650ConditionsColorectal PolypArmssecondary colonoscopy, conventional colonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Improving polyp detection at colonoscopy: Non-technological techniques.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Serrated lesions: A challenging enemy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ma Henar Núñez RodríguezGastroenterology Department, Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3676-3144
Pilar Díez RedondoGastroenterology Department, Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Fausto Riu PonsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6576-4226
Marta CimavillaGastroenterology Department, Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Luis HernándezGastroenterlogy Department, Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Spain.
Andrea LozaGastroenterlogy Department, Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0374-3873
Manuel Pérez-MirandaGastroenterology Department, Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Río Hortega · ESHospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus · ESHospital Del Mar · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonoscopy is the gold standard investigation for the detection of colorectal cancer, but the right colon is more difficult to examine than the left colon. A second examination of the proximal colon has the potential to reduce rates of missed pathology.

objectiveTo determine whether proximal retroflexion improves the adenoma detection rate or other outcomes in the right colon compared with the forward view.

methodsWe performed a multicentre randomized controlled trial of patients from the colorectal cancer screening programme with a positive faecal immunochemical test. Patients were randomized to a second right colon examination using proximal retroflexion or forward view.

resultsA total of 692 patients were included. A second examination of the right colon, with an average additional procedure time of 1.62 min, increased the adenoma detection rate by 11%, regardless of the method used (9% proximal retroflexion

conclusionsA second examination of the right colon, either from retroflexion or second forward view, can increase adenoma detection rate and shorten surveillance intervals in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. This should be emphasized during colonoscopy training and integrated into diagnostic colonoscopy practice.

Indexed as

AdenomaAgedColonColonic NeoplasmsColonic PolypsColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMiddle AgedMissed DiagnosisOccult BloodProspective Studiesadenoma detection ratecolorectal cancer screeningProximal retroflexion

Identifiers

PMID32379535
PMCPMC7437080
OpenAlexW3022622721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.