Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32379332›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Oncological Outcomes After Okabayashi-Kobayashi Radical Hysterectomy for Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Noriaki Sakuragi, Tatsuya Kato, Chisa Shimada, Masanori Kaneuchi, Yukiharu Todo, Takashi Mitamura, Mahito Takeda, Masataka Kudo, Gen Murakami, Hidemichi Watari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Noriaki SakuragiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Tatsuya KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Chisa ShimadaDepartment of Gynecology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Masanori KaneuchiDepartment of Gynecology, Otaru General Hospital, Otaru, Japan.
Yukiharu TodoDepartment of Gynecology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Takashi MitamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Mahito TakedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Masataka KudoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Gen MurakamiDepartment of Anatomy II, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hidemichi WatariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPOtaru Municipal Hospital · JPSapporo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The role of surgery in early-stage cervical cancer has been established, but it is controversial in locally advanced cervical cancer. Objective: To determine whether a radical hysterectomy method with extended removal of paracervical tissue for locally advanced cervical cancer is associated with satisfactory oncological outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2011, and participants were patients with cervical cancer at a single tertiary center in Northern Japan. The median follow-up period was 106 months, and none of the patients were lost to follow-up at less than 60 months. Data analyses were performed from July 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Exposures: Patients underwent radical hysterectomy using the Okabayashi-Kobayashi method. Bilateral nerve preservation was used for stage IB1/IB2 disease and unilateral nerve preservation for stage IIA/IIB if disease extension outside the uterine cervix was 1-sided. Chemotherapy was used as the choice of adjuvant treatment for patients with an intermediate or high risk of recurrence, while some patients chose or were assigned to radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were the 5-year local control rate and 5-year overall survival rate along with risk factor analysis. Results: Of 121 consecutive patients, 76 (62.8%) had early-stage cervical cancer in 2008 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB1 and IIA1 and 45 (37.2%) had locally advanced cervical cancer in stages IB2, IIA2, and IIB. The median (range) age was 42 (26-68) years. Adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 2 patients (3%) with early-stage cervical cancer and 3 (7%) of those with locally advanced cervical cancer. The 5-year local control rates for early-stage cervical cancer and locally advanced cervical cancer were 99% and 87%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for early-stage cervical cancer and locally advanced cervical cancer were 95% and 82%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and histology of adeno(squamous)carcinoma were independent risk factors for the overall survival of patients with cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: The nerve-sparing Okabayashi-Kobayashi radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer may provide survival not inferior to radical hysterectomy or radiotherapy in published literature. The applicability of radical hysterectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer needs to be validated by prospective comparative trials.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansHysterectomyJapanMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32379332
PMCPMC7206506
OpenAlexW3021754485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.