Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32379217›Full record

Trial reportMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2020

A multicenter, randomized study to select the minimum effective dose of estetrol (E4) in postmenopausal women (E4Relief): part 1. Vasomotor symptoms and overall safety.

Ulysse Gaspard, Mélanie Taziaux, Marie Mawet, Maud Jost, Valérie Gordenne, Herjan J T Coelingh Bennink, Rogerio A Lobo, Wulf H Utian, Jean-Michel Foidart

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Management of menopause.Australian prescriber · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Treating menopause - MHT and beyond.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Estetrol and Mammary Gland: Friends or Foes?Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ulysse GaspardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Mélanie TaziauxMithra Pharmaceuticals, Liège, Belgium.
Marie MawetMithra Pharmaceuticals, Liège, Belgium.
Maud JostMithra Pharmaceuticals, Liège, Belgium.
Valérie GordenneMithra Pharmaceuticals, Liège, Belgium.
Herjan J T Coelingh BenninkPantarhei Bioscience, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Rogerio A LoboColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Wulf H UtianCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Jean-Michel FoidartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Mithra Pharmaceuticals (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Liège · BEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USPantarhei Bioscience (Netherlands) · NLUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to select the minimum effective dose of estetrol (E4) for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women.

methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Postmenopausal women (n = 257, of whom 32 were hysterectomized) aged 40 to 65 years, with ≥7 moderate to severe hot flushes (HFs) per day, or 50 or more moderate to severe HFs weekly, received 2.5, 5, 10, or 15 mg E4, or placebo once-daily for a period of 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by recording the frequency and severity of HFs. Overall safety was assessed by recording adverse events, measuring endometrial thickness, and monitoring bleeding patterns. Treatment groups were compared using analysis of covariance.

resultsThe frequency of moderate to severe HFs decreased with all E4 doses. The difference in the percentage change of weekly HF frequency was significant for 15 mg E4 versus placebo at both W4 (-66% vs -49%, P = 0.032) and W12 (-82% vs -65%, P = 0.022). The decrease in severity of HFs was significantly more pronounced for 15 mg E4 than for placebo at both W4 (-0.59 vs -0.33, P = 0.049) and W12 (-1.04 vs -0.66, P = 0.049); the other doses failed to achieve statistical significance. In nonhysterectomized women, endometrial thickness increased during treatment and normalized following progestin treatment at study completion. No endometrial hyperplasia was observed.

conclusionsEstetrol 15 mg is considered to be the minimum effective daily oral dose for treatment of vasomotor symptoms. Its current seemingly favorable safety profile is further to be confirmed in phase 3 clinical development. : Video Summary:http://links.lww.com/MENO/A591.

Indexed as

Endometrial HyperplasiaEstetrolAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodEstrogensFemaleHot FlashesHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseTreatment OutcomeEstetrolEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID32379217
PMCPMC7386865
OpenAlexW3023230046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.