Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32378938›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2020

Does overloading cognitive resources mimic the impact of anxiety on temporal cognition?

Ioannis Sarigiannidis, Peter A Kirk, Jonathan P Roiser, Oliver J Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Anxiety makes time pass quicker: neural correlates.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ioannis SarigiannidisInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0002-1604-7511
Peter A KirkInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0003-0786-3039
Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-1228
Oliver J RobinsonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-1132

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K024280/1Medical Research Council MR/R020817/1MRF_Wellcome Trust/National Institutes of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety alters how we perceive the world and can alter aspects of cognitive performance. Prominent theories of anxiety suggest that the effect of anxiety on cognition is due to anxious thoughts "overloading" limited cognitive resources, competing with other processes. If this is so, then a cognitive load manipulation should impact performance of a task in the same way as induced anxiety. Thus, we examined the impact of a load manipulation on a time perception task that we have previously shown to be reliably impacted by anxiety. In contrast with our prediction, across 3 studies we found that time perception was insensitive to our load manipulation. Our results do not therefore support the idea that anxiety impacts temporal cognition by overloading limited cognitive resources, at least as induced by a commonly used load manipulation. Thus, anxiety might affect temporal cognition in a unique way, via an evolutionary-preserved defense survival system, as suggested by animal-inspired theories of anxiety, rather than competing for limited attentional resources. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32378938
PMCPMC7872305
OpenAlexW3023577481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.