Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32378746›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020

Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging.

Enrico Kaden, Noemi G Gyori, S Umesh Rudrapatna, Irina Y Barskaya, Iulius Dragonu, Mark D Does, Derek K Jones, Chris A Clark, Daniel C Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET, SPECT, and MRI imaging for evaluation of Parkinson's disease.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  3. Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Enrico KadenCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-3663
Noemi G GyoriCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
S Umesh RudrapatnaCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Irina Y BarskayaInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Iulius DragonuSiemens Healthcare Ltd, Frimley, UK.
Mark D DoesInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Chris A ClarkGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Daniel C AlexanderCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

MRI Toolbox for Rodent Brain Microstructure ImagingR01EB019980 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DOES, MARK D · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009513/1Department of HealthNIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019980Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096646/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 104943/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe gradient-echo MR signal in brain white matter depends on the orientation of the fibers with respect to the external magnetic field. To map microstructure-specific magnetic susceptibility in orientationally heterogeneous material, it is thus imperative to regress out unwanted orientation effects.

methodsThis work introduces a novel framework, referred to as microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging, that disentangles the 2 principal effects conflated in gradient-echo measurements, (a) the susceptibility properties of tissue microenvironments, especially the myelin microstructure, and (b) the axon orientation distribution relative to the magnetic field. Specifically, we utilize information about the orientational tissue structure inferred from diffusion MRI data to factor out the

resultsA human pilot study at 3 T demonstrates proxy maps of microscopic susceptibility anisotropy unconfounded by fiber crossings and orientation dispersion as well as magnetic field direction. The developed technique requires only a dual-echo gradient-echo scan acquired at 1 or 2 head orientations with respect to the magnetic field and a 2-shell diffusion protocol achievable on standard scanners within practical scan times.

conclusionsThe quantitative recovery of microscopic susceptibility features in the presence of orientational heterogeneity potentially improves the assessment of microstructural tissue integrity.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedWhite MatterAnisotropyBrainHumansPilot Projectsbrain white mattergradient-echo MR imagingmicroscopic frequency shiftorientational tissue heterogeneityspherical mean technique (SMT)

Identifiers

PMID32378746
PMCPMC7402021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.