Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32378377›Full record

ArticleCroatian medical journal2020

A mathematical model reveals sex-specific changes in glucose and insulin tolerance during rat puberty and maturation.

Marta Balog, Vedrana Ivić, Rudolf Scitovski, Irena Labak, Kálmán Ferenc Szűcs, Robert Gaspar, Sándor G Vári, Marija Heffer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Croatian medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marta Balog
Vedrana Ivić
Rudolf Scitovski
Irena Labak
Kálmán Ferenc Szűcs
Robert Gaspar
Sándor G Vári
Marija HefferMarija Heffer, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Medicine Osijek, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Josipa Huttlera 4, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia, mheffer@mefos.hr.
University of Osijek · HRUniversity of Szeged · HUCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effects of maturation and sex on glucose metabolism during glucose tolerance (GTT) and insulin tolerance tests (ITT) in young and adult male and female rats by using two different approaches - the conventional, which uses area under the curve and glucose curve, and mathematical modeling that identifies parameters necessary for determining the function that models glucose metabolism.

methodsMale and female rats at 3.5 and 12 months of age underwent standard GTT and ITT after overnight fasting. The parameters were identified by using Mathematica-module NonlinearModelFit [] for experimentally obtained data.

resultsWhen data were statistically analyzed, both sexes and age groups had similar glucose and insulin tolerance. In the mathematical model of GTT, parameters describing the rate of glucose concentration increase G'(0) and decrease G'I multiplied with maturation, with a concomitant decrease in the time point (tmax, tI) of reaching maximum and minimum glucose concentration (Gmax, G0). The mathematical model of ITT for males was independent of age, unlike of that for females, which had increased G'(0) and G'I, and more quickly recovered from hypoglycemia after maturation.

conclusionThe mathematical model revealed female susceptibility to large glucose excursions, which are better reflected by ITT in young animals and by GTT in adults.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseInsulinAgingAnimalsFemaleMaleModels, TheoreticalRatsSexual MaturationBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID32378377
PMCPMC7230410
OpenAlexW3023026374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.