Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32378258›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2020

Assessment of zebrafish embryo photomotor response sensitivity and phase-specific patterns following acute- and long-duration exposure to neurotoxic chemicals and chemical weapon precursors.

Chance M Carbaugh, Mark W Widder, Christopher S Phillips, David A Jackson, Valerie T DiVito, William H van der Schalie, Kyle P Glover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chance M CarbaughU.S. Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-9949-691X
Mark W WidderU.S. Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland.
Christopher S PhillipsU.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
David A JacksonU.S. Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland.
Valerie T DiVitoU.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, Military Operational Medicine Research Program, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland.
William H van der SchalieU.S. Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland.
Kyle P GloverU.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish are an attractive model for chemical screening due to their adaptability to high-throughput platforms and ability to display complex phenotypes in response to chemical exposure. The photomotor response (PMR) is an established and reproducible phenotype of the zebrafish embryo, observed 24 h post-fertilization in response to a predefined sequence of light stimuli. In an effort to evaluate the sensitivity and effectiveness of the zebrafish embryo PMR assay for toxicity screening, we analyzed chemicals known to cause both neurological effects and developmental abnormalities, following both short (1 h) and long (16 h+) duration exposures. These include chemicals that inhibit aerobic respiration (eg, cyanide), acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors (organophosphates pesticides) and several chemical weapon precursor compounds with variable toxicity profiles and poorly understood mechanisms of toxicity. We observed notable concentration-responsive, phase-specific effects in the PMR after exposure to chemicals with a known mechanism of action. Chemicals with a more general toxicity profile (toxic chemical weapon precursors) appeared to reduce all phases of the PMR without a notable phase-specific effect. Overall, 10 of 20 chemicals evaluated elicited an effect on the PMR response and eight of those 10 chemicals were picked up in both the short- and long-duration assays. In addition, the patterns of response uniquely differentiated chemical weapon precursor effects from those elicited by inhibitors of aerobic respiration and organophosphates. By providing a rapid screening test for neurobehavioral effects, the zebrafish PMR test could help identify potential mechanisms of action and target compounds for more detailed follow-on toxicological evaluations. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayChemical Warfare AgentsEmbryo, NonmammalianModels, AnimalMotor ActivityNeurotoxicity SyndromesNeurotoxinsOrganophosphorus CompoundsZebrafishChemical Warfare AgentsNeurotoxinsOrganophosphorus Compounds

Identifiers

PMID32378258
PMCPMC7496110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.