SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020
Screening strategies for hypertension.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal hypertension screening frequency in adults: a systematic review.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- Care Cascades for Hypertension in Low-Income Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of public health · 2023Pooled it
- The Online Health Information Needs of Family Physicians: Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Community-Based Hypertension Screening to Prevent Stroke in Underserved Urban Neighborhoods in French Guiana: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Driving NCD screening at scale: outcomes of a digital, CHW-led hypertension surveillance program in rural Rwanda.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Observational
- Article
- The ongoing quest for the independent patient: an interview study on healthcare professionals' perspectives on integrating self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension care.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- European Hypertension Guidelines: Similarities and What the Practicing Physician Should Keep in Mind.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Elevated Blood Pressure and Risk Factors in 19-Year-Olds in Serbia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a population-based prediction model for prevalent hypertension: evidence from Qatar biobank.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Gender and Age Differences in Hypertension Screening and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Rural Kazakhstan.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- Female Community Health Volunteer-led intervention for hypertension prevention and control in rural Nepal: A hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Explainable and interpretable models for predicting early-onset hypertension in the Tlalpan 2020 cohort.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Determinants, barriers, and facilitators of healthcare access for patients with hypertension in rural Ghana: applying the Andersen-Newman model of healthcare utilization.Global health action · 2025Article
- Preventable Hospitalization and Primary Healthcare Visits Among Hypertensive Patients in Makkah City.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Photobiomodulation Therapy in Hypertension Management-Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Treated but Uncontrolled: Characterizing Hypertension in a Sample of 357 Older Adults in the Southeastern United States.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension is a major public health challenge affecting more than one billion people worldwide; it disproportionately affects populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health systems are generally weak. The increasing prevalence of hypertension is associated with population growth, ageing, genetic factors, and behavioural risk factors, such as excessive salt and fat consumption, physical inactivity, being overweight and obese, harmful alcohol consumption, and poor management of stress. Over the long term, hypertension leads to risk for cardiovascular events, such as heart disease, stroke, kidney failure, disability, and premature mortality. Cardiovascular events can be preventable when high-risk populations are targeted, for example, through population-wide screening strategies. When available resources are limited, taking a total risk approach whereby several risk factors of hypertension are taken into consideration (e.g. age, gender, lifestyle factors, diabetes, blood cholesterol) can enable more accurate targeting of high-risk groups. Targeting of high-risk groups can help reduce costs in that resources are not spent on the entire population. Early detection in the form of screening for hypertension (and associated risk factors) can help identify high-risk groups, which can result in timely treatment and management of risk factors. Ultimately, early detection can help reduce morbidity and mortality linked to it and can help contain health-related costs, for example, those associated with hospitalisation due to severe illness and poorly managed risk factors and comorbidities.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of different screening strategies for hypertension (mass, targeted, or opportunistic) to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension. SEARCH
methodsAn Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS-Web), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) Bireme, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) without language, publication year, or publication status restrictions. The searches were conducted from inception until 9 April 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs (NRCTs), that is, controlled before and after (CBA), interrupted time series (ITS), and prospective analytic cohort studies of healthy adolescents, adults, and elderly people participating in mass, targeted, or opportunistic screening of hypertension. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Screening of all retrieved studies was done in Covidence. A team of reviewers, in pairs, independently assessed titles and abstracts of identified studies and acquired full texts for studies that were potentially eligible. Studies were deemed to be eligible for full-text screening if two review authors agreed, or if consensus was reached through discussion with a third review author. It was planned that at least two review authors would independently extract data from included studies, assess risk of bias using pre-specified Cochrane criteria, and conduct a meta-analysis of sufficiently similar studies or present a narrative synthesis of the results. MAIN
resultsWe screened 9335 titles and abstracts. We identified 54 potentially eligible studies for full-text screening. However, no studies met the eligibility criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is an implicit assumption that early detection of hypertension through screening can reduce the burden of morbidity and mortality, but this assumption has not been tested in rigorous research studies. High-quality evidence from RCTs or programmatic evidence from NRCTs on the effectiveness and costs or harms of different screening strategies for hypertension (mass, targeted, or opportunistic) to reduce hypertension-related morbidity and mortality is lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.