ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2020
Getting Psychology Back Onto Its Feet: the Developmental View of James Mark Baldwin.
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Desirable Behaviors in Dog-Assisted Interventions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Toward a Cultural Evolutionary Psychology: Why the Evolutionary Approach does not Imply Reductionism or Determinism.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2021Article
- From Clay Feet to New Psychology: Starting the Move.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide a general view of Baldwin's evolutionary theory on the interaction between ontogenesis and phylogeny processes and on the imitative reactions and its social implications in mental development. The focus is on the organic selection model as complementary developmental view to what has been posed by the target article of Zagaria et al. (Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, 2020) about evolutionary psychology understood as meta-theoretical perspective to resolve the nature-nurture dialectics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32378177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.