Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377984›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2020

The use of Endo-SPONGE

B Mahendran, B Rossi, M Coleman, S Smolarek

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Endoluminal vacuum therapy for the treatment of complete dehiscence of low colorectal anastomosis.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B MahendranDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK. Balaji.mahendran@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6252-9415
B RossiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK.
M ColemanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK.
S SmolarekDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of an endoluminal vacuum device (Endo-SPONGE

methodsAll studies looking at endoluminal vacuum therapy with Endo-SPONGE

conclusionsEndo-SPONGE

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakFemaleHumansIleostomyRectumTreatment OutcomeAnastomotic leakEndo-SPONGERectal cancerVacuum therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.