Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377963›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2020

Tracheostomy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome is not related to quality of life, symptoms of psychiatric disorders or return-to-work: the prospective DACAPO cohort study.

Sebastian Blecha, Magdalena Brandl, Florian Zeman, Frank Dodoo-Schittko, Susanne Brandstetter, Christian Karagiannidis, Thomas Bein, Christian Apfelbacher, DACAPO Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02637011 (Influence of Quality of Care and Individual Patient Characteristics on Quality of Life/ Return to Work in Survivors of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02637011 unknown statusnot on this map

Influence of Quality of Care and Individual Patient Characteristics on Quality of Life/ Return to Work in Survivors of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): Prospective, Observational, Multi-centre Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital RegensburgRan2014 to 2017Enrolled2,000ConditionsAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian BlechaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. Sebastian.Blecha@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-7588
Magdalena BrandlMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Florian ZemanCentre of Clinical Studies, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Frank Dodoo-SchittkoMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Susanne BrandstetterMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian KaragiannidisDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, ARDS and ECMO Centre, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Witten/Herdecke University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas BeinDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian ApfelbacherMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
DACAPO Study Group
University Hospital Regensburg · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GY1340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition that often requires prolonged mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy is a common procedure with some risks, on the other hand with potential advantages over orotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. This study investigated the association of tracheostomy with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms of psychiatric disorders and return-to-work of ARDS survivors.

methodsData were collected in the context of the prospective observational German-wide DACAPO study. Clinical and demographic patient data and treatment characteristics were obtained from the participating intensive care units (ICU). HRQoL and return-to-work were assessed using patient-reported questionnaires 3, 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge. HRQoL was measured with the Physical and Mental Component Scale of the Short-Form 12 Questionnaire (PCS-12, MCS-12). The prevalence of psychiatric symptoms (depression and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome-14. Physician-diagnosed anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder were recorded by patient self-report in the follow-up questionnaires. The associations of tracheostomy with HRQoL, psychiatric symptoms and return-to-work after 12 months were investigated by means of multivariable linear and logistic regression models.

resultsPrimary 877 ARDS patients (mean ± standard deviation: 54 ± 16 years, 68% male) survived and were discharged from ICU. Out of these patients, 478 (54.5%) were tracheotomised during ICU treatment. After 12 months, patient-reported outcomes could be analysed of 388 (44.2%) respondents, 205 with tracheostomy and 183 without. One year after ICU discharge, tracheostomy showed no significant association with physical or mental health-related quality of life (PCS-12: - 0.73 [- 3.96, 2.51]; MCS-12: - 0.71 [- 4.92, 3.49]), symptoms of psychiatric disorders (depression: 0.10 [- 1.43, 1.64]; PTSD: 3.31 [- 1.81, 8.43]; anxiety: 1.26 [0.41, 3.86]; obsessive-compulsive disorder: 0.59 [0.05, 6.68]) or return-to-work (0.71 [0.31, 1.64]) in the multivariable analysis (OR [95%-CI]).

conclusionsUp to 1 year after ICU discharge, neither HRQoL nor symptoms of psychiatric disorders nor return-to-work was affected by tracheostomy. Trial registration NCT02637011 (ClinicalTrials.gov, Registered 15 December 2015, retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

ARDSHealth-related quality of lifeIntensive careReturn-to-workTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID32377963
PMCPMC7203349
OpenAlexW3022474501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.