Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377959›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2020

Osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: trends in the German National Database 2007-2017.

Lisa Lindner, Johanna Callhoff, Rieke Alten, Andreas Krause, Wolfgang Ochs, Angela Zink, Katinka Albrecht

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of Systemic Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Osteoporosis management and falls prevention in patients with haemophilia: Review of haemophilia guidelines.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa LindnerEpidemiology Division, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. lisa.lindner@drfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8416-0463
Johanna CallhoffEpidemiology Division, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-2728
Rieke AltenSchlosspark Klinik, Internal Medicine 2, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Osteology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-4412
Andreas KrauseImmanuel Hospital, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang OchsRheumatism Practice Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Angela ZinkEpidemiology Division, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-9022
Katinka AlbrechtEpidemiology Division, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0886-0294
German Rheumatism Research Centre · DEImmanuel Krankenhaus · DESchlosspark-Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a frequent comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Due to the improved treatment options for RA, we expect a long-term decrease in osteoporosis as an accompanying disease. Data from the German National Database (NDB) were used to investigate whether the frequency of osteoporosis has changed in the last 10 years. From 2007 to 2017, approximately 4000 patients were documented annually with data on therapy and comorbidity. The cross-sectional data were summarised descriptively. Age, sex, disease duration, disease activity and glucocorticoids were considered as influencing factors. The Cochrane-Armitage test for trend was used to test whether the frequency of osteoporosis at the first visit changed from 2007 to 2017. Osteoporosis frequency in RA patients (mean age 63 years, 75% female) decreased from 20% in 2007 to 6% in 2017 (p < 0.001). The decrease affected women (22% to 17%) and men (14% to 8%) in all age groups and both short-term (≤ 2-year disease duration: 9% to 3%) and long-term RA patients (> 10-year disease duration: 28% to 20%). Patients with high disease activity and patients who took glucocorticoids (GC) were more often affected by osteoporosis than patients in remission or without GC. Drug prophylaxis in patients without osteoporosis increased (20% to 41% without GC, 48% to 55% with GC). Men with GC received less prophylactic treatment than women (48% vs. 57% in 2017). In this cohort, osteoporosis in patients with RA is less frequently observed compared to former years. RA-specific risk factors for osteoporosis such as disease activity and GC therapy have declined but long-term GC use is still present. Assessment of osteoporosis in RA patients should be investigated more consistently by bone density measurement. Male RA patients still need to be given greater consideration regarding osteoporosis drug prophylaxis, especially when GC therapy is needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionFemaleGermanyGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPrevalenceGlucocorticoidsComorbidityDisease activityGlucocorticoidsHealth care provisionRemission

Identifiers

PMID32377959
PMCPMC7591406
OpenAlexW3021590932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.