Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377915›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2020

Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future.

Valentine Ongeri Millien, Nabil M Mansour

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05107505 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of The Factors Affecting Bowel Preparation Adequacy for Colonoscopy

TypeobservationalSponsorAlexandra Hospital, Athens, GreeceRan2021 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsBowel Preparation, Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT07664800 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Nurse-Delivered Online Counseling on Invasive Pain, Anxiety, and Comfort Levels in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanko UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsColonoscopy (Procedure), 18 Years and Over, Literacy, No Communication DifficultiesArmsOnline Nursing Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Valentine Ongeri MillienSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St., Suite 8B, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Nabil M MansourSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St., Suite 8B, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. nabil.mansour@bcm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of this reviewColorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the USA. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and can offer both diagnosis and therapy. The bowel preparation remains a significant barrier for patients who need to undergo colonoscopy and is often cited as the most dreaded aspect of the colonoscopy process. Inadequate bowel preparations still occur in 10-25% of colonoscopies, and this in turn can lead to increased procedural times, lower cecal intubation rates, and shorter interval between colonoscopies. From a quality standpoint, it is imperative that we do what we can to decrease the rate of inadequate bowel preparations. This review will focus on recent data regarding bowel preparation and offers a glimpse into what may be coming in the future. RECENT

findingsRecent advances in the field have been made to improve tolerability of bowel preparations and allow for more adequate colonoscopies. Newer, lower volume, flavored preparations, the use of adjuncts, and using split-dose preparations all can help with tolerability, compliance, and, in turn, preparation quality. Edible bowel preparations may become available in the near future. Early data on the use of artificial intelligence for assessment of preparation quality has been promising. Additionally, utilization of smartphone technology for education prior to the bowel preparation has also been shown to improve the adequacy of bowel preparations.

conclusionsOngoing efforts to improve the tolerability and palatability of colonoscopy bowel preparations are important from a quality improvement standpoint to ensure the adequacy of colonoscopy. Incorporating patient-specific factors and comorbidities is also an essential aspect of improving the quality of bowel preparation. Leveraging technology to better communicate with and educate patients on the bowel preparation process is likely to play a larger role in the coming years.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerArtificial IntelligenceCatharticsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDietHumansPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicPreoperative CareQuality ImprovementSmartphoneCatharticsBowel preparationEducationPolyethylene glycolSmartphonesSodium picosulfateSplit prep dosing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.