ArticlePediatric cardiology2020
Comparison of Fontan Surgical Options for Patients with Apicocaval Juxtaposition.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-invasive Estimation of Pressure Drop Across Aortic Coarctations: Validation of 0D and 3D Computational Models with In Vivo Measurements.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- A systematic review of cardiacProgress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2023Review
- Is Doppler Echocardiography Adequate for Surgical Planning of Single Ventricle Patients?Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Apicocaval juxtaposition (ACJ) is a rare form of viscerocardiac malpositions in association with single-ventricle congenital heart defects. The Fontan surgery is the common palliation, and possible surgical options include ipsilateral, contralateral, and intra-atrial conduits. Concerns include lower hemodynamic performances or risks of conduit compression by the cardiac mass. This study investigates the hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of ACJ patients and potential surgical improvements. Ten consecutive ACJ patients were included, along with a reference cohort of ten non-ACJ patients. Magnetic resonance images were acquired at 6 ± 0.6 year follow-up for anatomical analysis and hemodynamic assessments using computational fluid dynamics. Metrics of interest are deformation index (DI), indexed power loss (iPL), and hepatic flow distribution (HFD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.