Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377892›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2020

Translation of the Frailty Paradigm from Older Adults to Children with Cardiac Disease.

Chaitanya Panchangam, David A White, Suma Goudar, Brian Birnbaum, Lindsey Malloy-Walton, Jami Gross-Toalson, Kimberly J Reid, Girish Shirali, Anitha Parthiban

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02999438 (Frailty in Children With Cardiac Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02999438 completednot on this map

Frailty in Children With Cardiac Disease: A Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityRan2016 to 2022Enrolled56ConditionsPulmonary Hypertension, Heart Failure, Single VentricleArmsActigraph to check activity levels at home
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Physiological Systems in Promoting Frailty.Comprehensive Physiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chaitanya PanchangamDepartment of Child Health, University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, MO, USA. panchangams@health.missouri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-0526
David A WhiteThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Suma GoudarThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Brian BirnbaumThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Lindsey Malloy-WaltonThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Jami Gross-ToalsonThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Kimberly J ReidThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Girish ShiraliThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Anitha ParthibanThe Ward Family Heart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children and adolescents with cardiac disease (CCD) have significant morbidity and lower quality of life. However, there are no broadly applicable tools similar to the frailty score as described in the elderly, to define functional phenotype in terms of physical capability and psychosocial wellbeing in CCD. The purpose of this study is to investigate the domains of the frailty in CCD. We prospectively recruited CCD (8-17.5 years old, 70% single ventricle, 27% heart failure, 12% pulmonary hypertension; NYHA classes I, II and III) and age and gender matched healthy controls (total n = 56; CCD n = 34, controls n = 22; age 12.6 ± 2.6 years; 39.3% female). We measured the five domains of frailty: slowness, weakness, exhaustion, body composition and physical activity using developmentally appropriate methods. Age and gender-based population norms were used to obtain Z scores and percentiles for each measurement. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare the two groups. The CCD group performed significantly worse in all five domains of frailty compared to healthy controls. Slowness: 6-min walk test with Z score -3.9 ± 1.3 vs -1.4 ± 1.3, p < 0.001; weakness: handgrip strength percentile 18.9 ± 20.9 vs 57.9 ± 26.0, p < 0.001; exhaustion: multidimensional fatigue scale percentile 63.7 ± 13.5 vs 83.3 ± 14.4, p < 0.001; body composition: height percentile 43.4 ± 29.5 vs 71.4 ± 25.2, p < 0.001, weight percentile 46.0 ± 36.0 vs 70.9 ± 24.3, p = 0.006, BMI percentile 48.4 ± 35.5 vs 66.9 ± 24.2, p = 0.04, triceps skinfold thickness 41.0 ± 24.0 vs 54.4 ± 22.1, p = 0.04; physical activity: pediatric activity questionnaire score 2 ± 0.6 vs 2.7 ± 0.6, p < 0.001. The domains of frailty can be quantified in children using developmentally appropriate methods. CCD differ significantly from controls in all five domains, supporting the concept of quantifying the domains of frailty. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to study frailty in CCD and examine if it predicts adverse health outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov identification number is NCT02999438. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02999438.

Indexed as

AdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleFrailtyHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMalePhenotypePhysical Functional PerformanceProspective StudiesQuality of LifeCardiomyopathyChildren with heart diseaseCongenital heart diseaseFontanFrailtyHeart failurePulmonary hypertensionQuality and outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32377892
PMCPMC7223568
OpenAlexW3023123213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.