ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
A novel classification of aberrant right hepatic ducts ensures a critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical implications of aberrant anatomy of the common hepatic duct in liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Pooled it
- A Case Report of a Double-Lumen Cystic Duct During Cholecystectomy and a Review of the Biliary Tree Variations.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Aberrant anatomy in the context of the critical view of safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with communicating accessory hepatic duct injury and management: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Anatomical Schemata Revealed by the Critical View of Safety Approach: A Proposal of the Hellenic Task Force on the Typology of Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (HETALCHO).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Impact of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Major iatrogenic bile duct injury during elective cholecystectomy: a Czech population register-based study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Novel per-oral cholangioscopy for treatment of occult accessory hepatic duct stones.Gastroenterology report · 2023Article
- A new variation of duplicated extrahepatic bile duct encountered intraoperatively on cholangiogram.Journal of surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Dual common bile duct examination with transcystic choledochoscopy and cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for suspected choledocholithiasis: a prospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- A Type V Aberrant Right Hepatic Duct Branching from the Cystic Duct: The Paramount Importance of Intraoperative Cholangiography in Supplementing the Critical View of Safety Technique in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.CRSLS : MIS case reports from SLSArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on the spatial relationship of an aberrant right hepatic duct (ARHD) with the cystic duct and gallbladder neck, we propose a practical classification to evaluate the specific form predisposing to injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
methodsWe retrospectively investigated the preoperative images (mostly magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) and clinical outcomes of 721 consecutive patients who underwent LC at our institute from 2015 to 2018. We defined the high-risk ARHD as follows: Type A: communicating with the cystic duct and Type B: running along the gallbladder neck or adjacent to the infundibulum (the minimal distance from the ARHD < 5 mm), regardless of the confluence pattern in the biliary tree. Other ARHDs were considered to be of low risk.
resultsA high-risk ARHD was identified in 16 cases (2.2%): four (0.6%) with Type A anatomy and 12 (1.7%) with Type B. The remaining ARHD cases (n = 34, 4.7%) were categorized as low risk. There were no significant differences in the operative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, hospital stay) between the high- and low- risk groups. Subtotal cholecystectomy was applied in four cases (25%) in the high-risk group, a significantly higher percentage than the low-risk group (n = 1, 2.9%). In all patients with high-risk ARHD, LC was completed safely without bile duct injury or conversion to laparotomy.
conclusionsOur simple classification of high-risk ARHD can highlight the variants located close to the dissecting site to achieve a critical view of safety and may contribute to avoiding inadvertent damage of an ARHD in LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.