Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377824›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Diagnosis and management of three optic neuropathies: a national survey.

Haeng-Jin Lee, Hyuna Kim, Ju-Yeun Lee

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation and management of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a national survey.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haeng-Jin LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
Hyuna KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, South Korea.
Ju-Yeun LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Myongji hospital, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Goyang, South Korea. leejy5293@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7540-7129
Gyeongsang National University Hospital · KRJeonbuk National University Hospital · KRMyongji Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to evaluate the current practice patterns of neuro-ophthalmologists in diagnosis and management of three optic neuropathies using a national survey in South Korea and to further compare the practices of neuro-ophthalmologists divided into junior and senior groups based on their clinical practice experience.

methodsAn anonymous, 15-question survey on the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy (TON), nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), and Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) was sent to all neuro-ophthalmologists registered with the Korean Neuro-ophthalmology Society. The questions addressed physician's practice duration as neuro-ophthalmologist, choices of MRI scans and laboratory tests for the diagnosis in suspected optic neuropathy, clinical experiences with steroids (e.g., side effects), and choices of treatment modalities and reason in in each optic neuropathy. All participants were classified into senior (≥ 10 years) and junior (< 10 years) groups.

resultsA total of 63 responders (response rate 78.8%) answered the questionnaire. All responders performed the basic blood tests and brain imaging for evaluating optic neuropathy. Observation was the most preferred option for TON (47.6%) and NAION (63.5%). Steroid use was the second most preferred, and the most selected indication of steroid was "when the patient wants" (58.7%) for TON and "severe visual loss or last eye" (66%) for NAION. The most preferred treatment for LHON was "prescribing idebenone" (69.7%) with a dose of 900 mg/day (63.8%). Forty-nine respondents (77.8%) experienced side effects of steroids. There was no significant difference between the senior and junior groups in all questionnaire answers (all p > 0.05).

conclusionOptic neuropathies are being managed similarly by the two groups in South Korea, and many of them still use steroids. We provided reliable reasons for our results compared with other countries.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesVisual AcuityAdultAntioxidantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlucocorticoidsHumansIncidenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOptic NerveOptic Nerve DiseasesRepublic of KoreaTreatment OutcomeUbiquinoneAntioxidantsGlucocorticoidsidebenoneUbiquinoneLeber’s hereditary optic neuropathyNeuro-ophthalmologyNonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathySurveyTraumatic optic neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID32377824
OpenAlexW3021577802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.