ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2020
Motherhood after cancer: fertility and utilisation of fertility-preservation methods.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving future care: the role of oncofertility education in medical curricula in Germany. Results of a nationwide survey of 346 medical students.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Targeting a novel tamoxifen-using pathway to preserve ovarian reserve in rats with experimental chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Artificial Reproductive Technology Use and Family-Building Experiences of Female Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- First reported case of a spontaneous and healthy pregnancy in a woman with persistent CAR T-cells 5 years after treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Knowledge and intentions to use fertility preservation among urban Chinese cancer patients: A study from Hong Kong.PloS one · 2024Article
- Revision and psychometric evaluation of a fertility intention scale for young women with breast cancer in Chinese Mainland.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- [Fertility preservation in patients with melanoma-a huge relief for those affected].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte's storing for fertility preservation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- A Warning Call for Fertility Preservation Methods for Women Undergoing Gonadotoxic Cancer Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Utilisation of Cryopreserved Gametes in Cancer Patients who Underwent Fertility Preservation.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDue to modern and individualised treatments, women at reproductive age have a high survival rate after cancer therapy. What are pregnancy and birth rates of women after cancer and how often do they use cryopreserved ovarian tissue or gametes?
methodsFrom 2007 to 2015, 162 women aged 26.7 ± 6.9 years were counselled for fertility preservation at a single University Fertility Centre. A questionnaire study was performed in average 3 and 6 years after the diagnosis of cancer. The women were asked about their fertility, partnership, family planning, and pregnancy history. 72 women (51%) answered a written questionnaire in 2016. 59 women were reached again by phone in 2019 (82%).
resultsThe preferred method of fertility preservation was ovarian tissue cryopreservation (n = 36, 50%); none of the women had ovarian hyperstimulation in order to cryopreserve oocytes. About 3 years after treatment, 37 women of 72 women (51%) of the women with a mean age of 29.9 years had a strong wish to conceive. 21/72 (29%) had actively tried to conceive after successful cancer treatment; eight women (11%) were already pregnant or had children. Six years after cancer diagnosis 16/59 (27%) women had ongoing anticancer treatment. 12/59 (20%) were pregnant or had children, while 39% (23/59) had no menstrual cycle. Only one woman used her cryopreserved ovarian tissue, but did not become pregnant.
conclusionAfter cancer and gonadotoxic treatment, women's desire to have a child is substantial. In this study, the rate of spontaneous pregnancies and births was 20% 6 years after gonadotoxic therapies. Not every woman, however, has the opportunity to conceive: factors impairing fertility include ongoing cancer treatment or persistent disease, no partner, no menstrual cycle, as well as other reasons for infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.