Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377771›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2020

Comparative efficacy of empagliflozin and drugs of baseline therapy in post-infarct heart failure in normoglycemic rats.

Marina Krasnova, Alexander Kulikov, Sergey Okovityi, Dmitry Ivkin, Andrey Karpov, Elena Kaschina, Alexey Smirnov

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina KrasnovaDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Center of Experimental Pharmacology Saint Petersburg Chemical Pharmaceutical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia. marina.krasnova@pharminnotech.com.
Alexander KulikovPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Sergey OkovityiDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Center of Experimental Pharmacology Saint Petersburg Chemical Pharmaceutical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitry IvkinDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Center of Experimental Pharmacology Saint Petersburg Chemical Pharmaceutical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey KarpovAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Elena KaschinaCharite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitat Berlin, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany.
Alexey SmirnovPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Saint - Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical Academy · RUFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUFederal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre · RUGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effects of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin on chronic heart failure (HF) in normoglycemic rats. The effects of empagliflozin were compared with the standard medications for HF, e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor fosinopril, beta-blocker bisoprolol, and aldosterone antagonist spironolactone. Myocardial infarction (MI) was induced in male Wistar rats via permanent ligation of the left descending coronary artery. One-month post MI, 50 animals were randomized into 5 groups (n = 10): vehicle-treated, empagliflozin (1.0 mg/kg), fosinopril (10 mg/kg), bisoprolol (10 mg/kg), and spironolactone (20 mg/kg). All medications except empagliflozin were titrated within a month and administered per os daily for 3 months. Echocardiography, 24-hour urine volume test, and treadmill exercise tests were performed at the beginning and at the end of the study. Treatment with empagliflozin slowed the progression of left ventricular dysfunction: LV sizes and ejection fraction were not changed and the minute volume was significantly increased (from 52.0 ± 15.5 to 61.2 ± 21.2 ml/min) as compared with baseline. No deaths occurred in empagliflozin group. The 24-hour urine volume tends to be higher in empagliflozin and spironolactone groups than in vehicle and fosinopril group. Moreover, empagliflozin exhibited maximal physical exercise tolerance in comparison with all investigated groups (289 ± 27 s versus 183 ± 61 s in fosinopril group, 197 ± 95 s in bisoprolol group, and 47 ± 46 s in spironolactone group, p = 0.0035 for multiple comparisons). Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced progression of left ventricular dysfunction and improved tolerance of physical exercise in normoglycemic rats with HF. Empagliflozin treatment was superior with respect to physical tolerance compared with fosinopril, bisoprolol, and spironolactone.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsBisoprololCardiovascular AgentsChronic DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalExercise ToleranceFosinoprilGlucosidesHeart FailureMaleMyocardial InfarctionRats, WistarSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsSpironolactoneVentricular Dysfunction, LeftBenzhydryl CompoundsBisoprololCardiovascular AgentsempagliflozinFosinoprilGlucosidesSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsSpironolactoneChronic heart failureEmpagliflozinLeft ventricular dysfunctionNormoglycemic ratsPhysical exercise

Identifiers

PMID32377771
OpenAlexW3021316818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.