Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377603›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2020

Predictive factors and radiological findings of adrenohepatic adhesion during laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Katsuhiro Ito, Hiromasa Araki, Toshihiro Uchida, Yumi Manabe, Yu Miyazaki, Haruki Itoh, Mutsuki Mishina, Hiroshi Okuno

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katsuhiro ItoDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6322-9190
Hiromasa ArakiDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-216X
Toshihiro UchidaDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2785-5132
Yumi ManabeDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-5892
Yu MiyazakiDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-4812
Haruki ItohDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1580-4485
Mutsuki MishinaDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2659-0331
Hiroshi OkunoDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6293-5184
Kyoto Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to identify predictive factors and imaging features of adrenohepatic adhesion found during laparoscopic right adrenalectomy. Materials and Methods: Altogether, 77 patients underwent laparoscopic right adrenalectomy between January 2005 and December 2018. Adrenohepatic adhesion was defined as strict adhesion that required either partial adrenalectomy with coagulation of residual tissue or partial hepatectomy to accomplish complete resection. We assessed their surgical video records to determine if adrenohepatic adhesion was present. Age, sex, body mass index, tumor size, tumor diagnosis and radiological findings (attachment between the liver and the adrenal gland, diameters of the right and left adrenal veins and its ratio) were evaluated as preoperative variables. Results: Adrenohepatic adhesion was present in 11 of the 77 patients (14.3%). Age, sex, and body mass index were not statistically significant factors. Tumor size was significantly small in adhesion group (14.2 mm vs. 25.9 mm, p=0.02). Attachment to the liver and adrenal gland was frequently seen regardless of the adhesion. The mean right/left adrenal veins diameters ratio was significantly lower in the adhesion group (0.8 vs. 1.1, p=0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated the right/left adrenal veins diameters ratio was the only significant predictor of adhesion. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value were 0.82, 0.76, 0.43, and 0.95 respectively when the optimal cutoff value for the ratio was 0.9 (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.90). Conclusions: The right/left adrenal veins diameters ratio was possible predictor of adrenohepatic adhesion.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdrenalectomyAdrenal Gland DiseasesAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTissue AdhesionsAdrenalectomyAdrenal glandsLaparoscopyRadiographyTissue adhesions

Identifiers

PMID32377603
PMCPMC7189108
OpenAlexW3005130715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.