Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377562›Full record

ArticleSports medicine international open2020

Adaption of Maximal Glycolysis Rate after Resistance Exercise with Different Volume Load.

Nico Nitzsche, Julian Christian Lenz, Pjotr Voronoi, Henry Schulz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Maximal lactate accumulation rate (European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Is the vLamax for Glycolysis What theSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diagnostics ofMetabolites · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nico NitzscheInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Technische Universitat Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Julian Christian LenzInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Technische Universitat Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Pjotr VoronoiInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Technische Universitat Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Henry SchulzInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Technische Universitat Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Chemnitz University of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of six-weeks of resistance training with different volume load on the maximum glycolysis rate. 24 male strength-trained volunteers were assigned in a high volume low load (50% of their 1RM with 5 sets and reps up to muscle failure) and a low volume high load (70% of their 1RM with 5 sets of ten reps) resistance exercise group. The resistance training performed 3 days per week over 6 weeks. The maximum glycolysis rate was determined using isokinetic force testing before and after the intervention. There was a significant increase in glycolysis rate over the training period across all subjects (p=0.032). High volume low load exercise increased significantly from 0.271±0.067 mmol·l

Indexed as

anaerobic metabolismanaerobic powerlactatemuscle adaptionresistance exercise

Identifiers

PMID32377562
PMCPMC7198261
OpenAlexW3020512930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.