Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377455›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Impact of

Yuqing Sun, Shi Zhong, Bo Deng, Qinsheng Jin, Jie Wu, Jinxi Huo, Jianxun Zhu, Cheng Zhang, Yougui Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuqing SunSericultural Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou, China.
Shi ZhongSericultural Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou, China.
Bo DengInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Qinsheng JinAgricultural Technology Extension Service Center of Nanxun District, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jie WuInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Jinxi HuoSericultural Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou, China.
Jianxun ZhuSericultural Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou, China.
Cheng ZhangHangzhou Zhengxing Animal Husbandry co. LTD, Linan, Zhejiang, China.
Yougui LiSericultural Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou, China.
Sericultural Research Institute · CNAnimal Science Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics are the most commonly used growth-promoting additives in pig feed especially for weaned piglets. But in recent years their use has been restricted because of bacterial resistance.

methodsA total of 72 crossbred piglets were randomly assigned to three dietary treatment groups (

resultsThe ADG (1-28 day) of piglets was significantly higher in SH and ATB treatment groups (

conclusionOur work demonstrated that though SH slightly influenced the microbiota structure, it markedly reduced the fecal

Indexed as

AntibioticFecal microbiotaGrowth promotingImmunological parametersPhellinus gilvusPiglet

Identifiers

PMID32377455
PMCPMC7194088
OpenAlexW3021359502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.