ArticlePeerJ2020
The mitochondrial phylogeny of land plants shows support for Setaphyta under composition-heterogeneous substitution models.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitoplastomic discordance in Brassicaceae phylogenomics confirms the complex evolutionary history of the family.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Newly assembled mitochondrial genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comprehensive sampling of mitochondrial genomes substantiates the Neoproterozoic origin of land plants.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Phylogenomics of angiosperms based on mitochondrial genes: insights into deep node relationships.BMC biology · 2025Article
- From barcodes to genomes: a new era of molecular exploration in bryophyte research.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Characterizing conflict and congruence of molecular evolution across organellar genome sequences for phylogenetics in land plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- An empirical analysis of mtSSRs: could microsatellite distribution patterns explain the evolution of mitogenomes in plants?Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Article
- The Chloroplast Land Plant Phylogeny: Analyses Employing Better-Fitting Tree- and Site-Heterogeneous Composition Models.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Target capture and genome skimming for plant diversity studies.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congruence among analyses of plant genomic data partitions (nuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial) is a strong indicator of accuracy in plant molecular phylogenetics. Recent analyses of both nuclear and chloroplast genome data of land plants (embryophytes) have, controversially, been shown to support monophyly of both bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts) and tracheophytes (lycopods, ferns, and seed plants), with mosses and liverworts forming the clade Setaphyta. However, relationships inferred from mitochondria are incongruent with these results, and typically indicate paraphyly of bryophytes with liverworts alone resolved as the earliest-branching land plant group. Here, we reconstruct the mitochondrial land plant phylogeny from a newly compiled data set. When among-lineage composition heterogeneity is accounted for in analyses of codon-degenerate nucleotide and amino acid data, the clade Setaphyta is recovered with high support, and hornworts are supported as the earliest-branching lineage of land plants. These new mitochondrial analyses demonstrate partial congruence with current hypotheses based on nuclear and chloroplast genome data, and provide further incentive for revision of how plants arose on land.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.