Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377350›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2020

Xin Gong, Zhihua Xie, Kaijie Qi, Liangyi Zhao, Yazhou Yuan, Jiahui Xu, Weikang Rui, Katsuhiro Shiratake, Jianping Bao, Shahrokh Khanizadeh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CaHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contribution of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xin Gong1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Zhihua Xie1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Kaijie Qi1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Liangyi Zhao1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Yazhou Yuan1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Jiahui Xu1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Weikang Rui1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Katsuhiro Shiratake2Laboratory of Horticultural Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Jianping Bao3College of Plant Science, Tarim University, Ala'er City, China.
Shahrokh KhanizadehELM Consulting Inc., St-Lazare, Canada.
Shaoling Zhang1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Shutian Tao1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31372044National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31672105National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31972361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) and secondary cell wall (SCW) thickening in pear fruit are accompanied by the deposition of cellulose and lignin to form stone cells. Metacaspase is an important protease for development, tissue renewal and PCD. The understanding of the molecular mechanism whereby pear (

Indexed as

Arabidopsis thalianaCell wallPlant cell death

Identifiers

PMID32377350
PMCPMC7193627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.