Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377266›Full record

Trial reportBehavioural neurology2020

Treatment Effects of Upper Limb Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Rehabilitation Outcomes after Subacute Stroke: A Pilot Study.

Yu-Wei Hsieh, Yu-Hsuan Lin, Jun-Ding Zhu, Ching-Yi Wu, Yun-Ping Lin, Chih-Chi Chen

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioural neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02871700 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Efficacy Study of Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy After Stroke: Rehabilitation Outcomes and Neural Mechanisms by MEG

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled21ConditionsStrokeArmsAction observation therapy, Mirror therapy, Customary bilateral UE training
NCT06027125 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Long Term Effects of Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Upper Limb Functional and Fine Motor Outcomes After Subacute Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled44ConditionsStrokeArmsAction observation Therapy, Mirror Therapy
NCT06074081 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of 4-weeks of Motor Relearning Program and Mirror Therapy in Improving Upper Limb Motor Function in Stroke Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorYusra Medical and Dental CollegeRan2023 to 2024Enrolled28ConditionsAcute StrokeArmsmotor relearning program, mirror therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Feasibility and efficacy of an early sensory-motor rehabilitation program on hand function in patients with stroke: a pilot, single-subject experimental design.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  19. A computer-aid speech rehabilitation system with mirrored video generating.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Wei HsiehDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2564-8431
Yu-Hsuan LinDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jun-Ding ZhuDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-4087
Ching-Yi WuDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-2916
Yun-Ping LinDivision of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chih-Chi ChenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Chang Gung University · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAction observation therapy and mirror therapy, two promising rehabilitation strategies, are aimed at enhancing the motor learning and functional improvement of stroke patients through different patterns of visual feedback and observation.

objectiveThis study investigated and compared the treatment effects of the action observation therapy, mirror therapy, and active control intervention on motor and functional outcomes of stroke patients.

methodsTwenty-one patients with subacute stroke were recruited in this study. All patients were randomly assigned to the action observation therapy, mirror therapy, or active control intervention for 3 weeks. Outcome measures were conducted at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and secondary outcomes included the Box and Block Test, Functional Independence Measure, and Stroke Impact Scale. Descriptive analyses and the number of patients whose change score achieved minimal clinically important difference were reported.

resultsBoth the action observation therapy and active control intervention showed similar improvements on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Box and Block Test, and Stroke Impact Scale. Moreover, the action observation therapy had a greater improvement on the Functional Independence Measure than the other 2 groups did. However, the mirror therapy group gained the least improvements on the outcomes.

conclusionThe preliminary results found that the patients in the action observation therapy and active control intervention groups had comparable benefits, suggesting that the 2 treatments might be used as an alternative to each other. A further large-scale study with at least 20 patients in each group to validate the study findings is needed. This trial is registered with NCT02871700.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTaiwanTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID32377266
PMCPMC7199557
OpenAlexW2997067910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.